Author: Xu Wenbin
The Taiwan ruling authorities pushed the Hong Kong murderer Chen Tongjia, who was unwilling to accept the murderer in Taiwan, and entered the country, causing public opinion in various circles.The reasonable suspicion was because of pure political considerations to respond to the anti -fugitive regulations of the people of Hong Kong, and then covered their minds with the action of the case of this case.However, from the perspective of the field of legal fields, such a way is to have more sequelae, which is worthy of careful thinking.
The crime of this murder case is in Taiwan, and Taiwan has jurisdiction in Taiwan according to law.And the Shilin Procuratorate has issued a wanted order.The principle of criminal judicial jurisdiction is a common legal system internationally applicable.As for the laws in Hong Kong, there is no provisions of the jurisdiction of judicial jurisdictions in response to Hong Kong people's crimes outside of its field.The behavior of this case is not in Hong Kong, but in Taiwan, so only Taiwan's justice can pursue prosecution and punishment.Hong Kong has neither judicial jurisdiction, and has no way to deal with it.Therefore, if the judicial organs in Taiwan will not hold this case, it may not be able to explain to the family members of the victims (the deceased). How can it be fair?
This case is not only a criminal bank to take the initiative to get the investigation review, and the issue of the wanted order is the Shilin District Procuratorate of Taiwan.Woolen cloth?What is this political manipulation?
The green camp authorities said: Wait for Taiwan and Hong Kong to book lsquo; RSQUO; Judicial Mutual Aid Agreement RSQUO;, can accept murderers who are in Hong Kong to come to Taiwan to invest.This is simply unreasonable in law.Because the defendant took the initiative to invest in the case; the judicial mutual aid mechanism in different places was dealing with the defendant who was unwilling to take the initiative to accept the trial of judicial jurisdiction.Only in this case can we need to use the mechanism of judicial mutual assistance.If the defendant took the initiative to enter the country, there was no need to go through the channels of judicial assistance through different places.
As for the evidence of the killing of people in this case, the defendant's self -confession of the defendant's free will is legal. It is already the strongest and powerful evidence.Moreover, when the Shilin Procuratorate issued a wanted order, of course, it has already had considerable evidence before it will be released.With the confession of the existing evidence, and the confession of the defendant, it is enough to be guilty of identification. How can we still need to teach the Hong Kong government to provide evidence in Hong Kong?Today, the relevant statements of the main administrative of Taiwan are not as nonsense.(The author is a lawyer and Honorary Chairman of the China Human Rights Association (Taipei City))
