Source: Wen Bao News Agreement
Chief Executive Lin Zhengyue held a first community dialogue with more than 100 citizens last night.Affected by anti -repair storms, the impact of violence continued, and the society was severely torn. In such an atmosphere, the government was able to take care of the pressure to conduct dialogue, showing the government's sincerity, willingness to be responsible, and willing to listen to different or even sharp voices.Dialogue instead of confrontation and adopting the first step in the tear.Dialogue participants express their own opinions and respect different opinions. To a certain extent, it is the mainstream values of rational tolerance and respect for each other. It is conducive to the government to accurately grasp the public opinion and solve problems in a targeted manner.It is hoped that the government and the people will maintain a benign interaction, continue to promote dialogue between different levels, deeper exchanges, seek common ground while depositing, solve the knot, and find the way out of the predicament.
Anti -repair violence has shocked the protracted and long -lasting, and has not yet subsided. Some citizens still have distrust, dissatisfaction, and even hostility about the government. There are many opinions in the society who doubt whether the dialogue will be effective.The public relations Show.In this situation, the government insists on the first community dialogue as scheduled, and it is successfully completed, showing that the dialogue has an underestimation value.
First of all, for the government, dialogue is an important step in truly entering the community and directly facing citizens.The conversation is open and transparent, and live broadcast through various media.Seeing at the scene, most speakers criticized the chief executive Lin Zhengyue and the government's criticism, and even relentlessly. It shows that the participants and speakers have not been screened, and there is no problem in the government.The government had a deeper dialogue, and the government immediately agreed to arrange, reflecting the government's sincerity, daring to face the questioning of various citizens with various positions, and sincerely listened to the true opinions of the citizens.
Secondly, yesterday's participants expressed their opinions and respect different voices. To a certain extent, they showed the mainstream values and fine traditions of rational tolerance in Hong Kong.The dialogue was orderly, and the spokesperson expressed different opinions, and there were many fierce words.What is relieved is that in the current environment of the yellow and blue walls, different opinions during the conversation did not attack each other, and there was no one that accounted for the majority of the other party to suppress the other party's expression.Respecting the democratic literacy of your right to speak, reflects the tradition of being open and respect for each other in Hong Kong, which is still the necessary mentality and demeanor to start dialogue, and the most important foundation for maintaining dialogue.
Third, Chief Executive Lin Zheng Yue'e made a more targeted response to the speaker's question and questioning, and conducted a more frank communication.For example, she admits that the recent Hong Kong is not a familiar Hong Kong. How to resume Hong Kong requires everyone to work together to emphasize that the government should bear the greatest responsibility; admits that the government has not fully understood the needs of young people before.Directly communicate out of the predicament; but at the same time, it is emphasized that the rule of law is the core value of Hong Kong. Young people or anyone must have the consequences in violation of the law. It is not good for the rule of law to destroy the rule of law.A stable Hong Kong, but emphasizing that there is a bottom line of one country, two systems, Hong Kong to maintain one country, two systems, is not a Hong Kong autonomy; she said that one of the focus of social appeal today is to establish an independent investigation committee.The public report was submitted within a month. At that time, everyone could see the truth, and in response to this incident, the supervisor will invite independent overseas experts.Lin Zhengyue responded clearly on the participants and the most concerned issues at present, and also showed the government's principles and bottom lines.
One dialogue cannot be solved by the problem, and even the participants may not be satisfied with Lin Zhengyue and the government's response.But in any case, the dialogue is always better than confrontation. As long as you maintain a rational and inclusive mentality to maintain dialogue, the government clarifies the concepts and countermeasures of solving problems, and accurately grasp and respond to citizens' demands.It is more constructive and can gradually move towards a win -win situation.
