How did the Cai Yingwen government use the regulations for fugitives?

Source: Lianhe News Agency

After many days of protests and conflicts, Hong Kong's Souvenile Lin Zheng Yue'e recently announced the suspension of the review of the fugitive regulations. One of the reasons is that Taiwan has stated that it has refused to be transferred according to this repair.However, the people of Hong Kong were still very dissatisfied. Yesterday, more than one million people continued to fight on the streets and asked the Hong Kong government to withdraw the law. Lin Zhengyue finally apologized to Hong Kong people.In order to highlight the support of Hong Kong's democracy, President Tsai stated that Taiwan was unwilling to do evil laws; the Presidential Palace criticized Lin Zhengyue to drag Taiwan, which is an irresponsible practice.In fact, the Cai government may not be the accomplice of evil law, but use the situation arbitrage in a roundabout.

The revision of the fugitive regulations was that Chen Tongjia, a man in Hong Kong last year, killed his girlfriend Pan Xiaoying in Taiwan. After Chen Tongjia fled back to Hong Kong, the case happened.Because the Hong Kong and Taiwan did not have an extradition agreement, the Hong Kong party did not agree with Chen Tongjia to come to Taiwan to judge; and because Hong Kong's justice was localism, there was no jurisdiction over the murder case, so he only sued Chen Tongjia for prison for light crimes such as money laundering.

A well -known murderer was unable to accept trials and was a serious injury to judicial justice.Last year, after the investigation of the Shilin Procuratorate, the MAC asked the MAC to transfer to the Hong Kong government for judicial assistance.When the MAC was transferred, it emphasized not to accept the treatment under the principles of the first Central China; the Hong Kong party stated that it would be handled in accordance with the legal framework of Hong Kong, and no following will be seen since then.As of mid -February this year, the Hong Kong Government announced the training of fugitives and incorporated Taiwan into the scope of judicial mutual assistance.At that time, the Ministry of Law of the Taiwan Law immediately expressed his optimism and affirmed that it was a progressive legislation.

Compared to the affirmation of the Ministry of Justice's affirmation, the MAC did not make any expressions at that time.It was not until late February that the MAC claimed that if the regulations were formulated in accordance with the principles of the first Central China, Taiwan would never accept it.That is, the focus of the MAC is still involved in one middle school, not judicial justice or other human rights considerations.From this, it can be reasonably inferred that according to the reaction of the Tsai government, the Hong Kong party believes that as long as the Hong Kong side avoids the issue of China, the issue of judicial mutual assistance in Taiwan and Hong Kong can be solved.Judging from the draft fugitive regulations later, the content did not involve the text of the first middle.The problem is that the Hong Kong Government misaches the situation. In order to please Beijing, the extradition scope is expanded to mainland China, which has triggered doubts from Hong Kong people, so that the situation is unpredictable.

On the other hand, the Cai government saw that the Hong Kong side had a big deal and decided to take the demonstration of the demonstration as its own political capital. Not only did they increase the high -profile opposition, it also declared that if the Hong Kong Legislative Council passed the case, it would not be ruled out that Hong Kong was listed as a tourism warning area.Both President Tsai and the MAC stated that even if the Hong Kong government passed the fugitive regulations, Taiwan would not accept Chen Tongjia to Taiwan according to this regulation.When Lin Zhengyue announced the suspension of the review, he took Taiwan as an excuse to kill him by knife, but the Cai government did give it a handle.

From the perspective of freedom and democracy, of course, the people of Taiwan must fully support the actions of Hong Kong people to fight for democracy.However, from the beginning of the Government of Cai Government who demanded extradition and murderers, later opposed the fugitive regulations, and even condemned the Hong Kong government's violation of human rights.It is not from the perspective of judicial human rights or national interests.Tsai Ing -wen cleverly changed his position and speaking during the incident. Instead, Lin Zhengyue had detonated the Hong Kong people's reflection for the sake of the charity.

The one -China principle of Nianzi in the Mainland Council is the most obvious example.Hong Kong is not only a special administrative region in China. It is necessary to skip the principles of China and Taiwan to talk about the judicial mutual assistance agreement with Taiwan. The opportunity is minimal.And if the true assistance of Chen and Hong Kong is in the case of the Chen Case, the Cai government will inevitably use it as a break through the war. As for whether the Chen case can be resolved and whether the justice is manifested, it is not the focus of its attention.This is the truth of the Cai government facing the regulations of the Chen case and fugitives: judicial, human rights, and justice are second, and political operations are the primary considerations.

Lin Zhengyue ordered the regulations on fugitives who were angry at Hong Kong people. She was self -fruit.The Tsai government used the wave of people's grievances to use this regulation in a clever operation to help Cai Yingwen earn a great victory in primary elections.What is so emotional is the family of the victim Pan Xiaoying. Her parents have repeatedly came to Taiwan to ask for extradition Chen Tongjia; but such a humble request was drowned in the political wrestling of the three places on both sides of the strait and could not be achieved.