Early Thistle Yan Chunqiu
During the Golden Week of China National Day, public opinion was most concerned about the full scenic area, and it was not even a new round of Chinese -American rhetoric caused by US Vice President Mike Pence.
On October 4th, a parent named Li in Beijing posted on Weibo that at 10:30 am on October 2nd, in a mall in Beijing in Beijing, his wife took a 11 -month -old child to shop in the mall.He was attempted, but the police did not set up the case, and only punished the four people involved in the case for five days.
The parents of Li surnamed Li believed that several women snatched their children in the mall during the day and suspected of trafficking for children's criminal cases. The police had punished the personnel involved too lightly, and he had applied for reconsideration to the police.
This matter quickly fermented on the Internet, attracting overwhelming comments.While most of the netizens expressed their anger at the incident of grabbing children under the day of Guangtianhua, they also suspected that the police had a motivation for small things and small things, and supported Mr. Li for a statement.
Faced with the sudden public opinion storm, the Beijing police announced on October 5 that the case was reviewed, and the case was reported in detail on October 6.
Police reported that on the morning of October 2, the woman advocated that she was carrying her son (11 months old) when shopping in a shopping mall in Fengtai, and encountered three women blocking. One of the women would lie in the baby car.The child picked up and wanted to leave. The other two women blocked Zhang. After the victim called for help, the mall staff stopped the behavior of the three women and returned the child back to Zhang. The three women left the scene.
The victim subsequently called the Fengtai Dahongmen Police Station to call the police, and the police arrived at the scene.During this period, the person involved in the case went to the operation department of the mall twice, saying that the staff of the mall snatched their children and asked to return it. The police brought the relevant personnel back to the police station for review.
Police said that 62 -year -old Li Mou had a disagreement with his son and his daughter -in -law Zhang Moumou. Zhang Moumou rejected Li Mou to see his grandson for 14 months. The two sides had repeatedly conflicted and called the police for help.Because Li Mou has never seen his grandson, he has repeatedly told his friends Sha Moumou, Gao Moumou, Yun Moumou and others that Sha Moumou is equivalent to sympathizing with Li Mou's experience and is willing to help Li Mou to find his daughter -in -law to return to the child.provide help.On October 2nd, Li Mou and Sha Moumou met a community where Li Mou's daughter -in -law lived, ready to find Li Mou's daughter -in -law to ask for children.
At about 10 am that day, Li saw a female affairs that a baby car was advocating a baby car out of the community. From the side face and body shape, Zhang Mou was identified as his daughter -in -law.Let Sha Moumou, Gao Moumou and Yun Moumou continue to catch up with their daughter -in -law.Staff stop and call the police.
Police comparison through photos confirmed that the matter was advocating that a certain and Li Mo daughter -in -law wearing glasses, there are similarities in height, body, and face shape. In addition to Li Mou observed from a long distance, he recognizes people.I have never seen Li Mou's daughter -in -law himself.
On October 3rd, Fengtai Police made a decision on no case, and made a five -day penalty decision to disturb the order of Li Mou, Sha Moumou, Yunmou, Gao Moumou, and so on.On October 4, the husband advocated that a husband went to the Fengtai Branch to reconsideily, and the police had accepted it.The case is currently being handled.
It is not difficult to see from the police's notification that this is a incident caused by a child custody dispute.Several aunts who lacked legal common sense mistakenly recognized Ms. Zhang and her children as Li's daughter -in -law and grandson, and staged a farce of Li's grandson in the mall.From a legal perspective, this incident of grabbing children is still not a criminal case for profit or illegal adoption of children, and it is an illegal act that disturb social order.
Although the police's notification is relatively timely, the evidence chain listed is very complete, but the public opinion storm has not been subsided.Many netizens still think that the person involved should be severely punished, accusing the police of being suspected of law enforcement with thin mud.After all, several people involved snatched the baby from the mother's hands under the light of the day. No one would be angry. In addition, the case of child trafficking happened from time to time, and the righteousness of netizens was fully understandable.
However, the essence of the rule of law is based on facts and law as the criterion.Public anger should be the consideration of the judicial organs, but it cannot completely replace the law, otherwise it will only damage the rule of law.Under the pressure of public opinion, the Beijing police announced that the case was still being handled.Police are too light to punish the administrative detention of several people involved in the case, and whether several people involved will be aggravated by the public. The public will wait and see.
On the other hand, in addition to applying for reconsideration to the police, the parties who are frightened and hurt can also submit civil compensation to several personnel involved, so that they pay more about their legal blind behaviors.
However, both judicial organs and parties should take action within the legal framework.This is very important to the construction of the rule of law that is still fragile in China.
