Early Beijing Yiye
CCTV female reporters were in the Hong Kong Issues Forum in the UK, and they were also accused of holding volunteers (in fact, the video was not shot), and her behavior caused controversy, but in contrast, the official response of Chinese officials is even more difficult to understand.The Chinese Embassy in the Britain stated that she supported her, which would not help promote the strategic goal of diplomatic, but also had different images of the major power established by Beijing.So, what are the considers of the embassy?
The currently known facts are: Sunday (September 30), the British Conservative Annual Conference, held a forum that sympathized with the people's demands of the people of Hong Kong in Birmingham.Kong Linlin, a 48 -year -old CCTV reporter in London, suddenly got up at the end of the forum, and Rogers, vice chairman of the Conservative Human Rights Committee, lied against China and scolded the invited guests from Hong Kong as traitors.
The live video showed that when a young volunteer from Hong Kong asked her to leave, she slapped her hand.She was arrested for a time and was released.
The Chinese embassy spokesperson in the UK immediately said on the official website by answering reporters that Britain has always advertised the freedom of speech, but the female journalists who asked questions and express their opinions could be completely unacceptable at all.The spokesman also criticized the organizer as an anti -China division forces Zhang Mu, demanding that he stopped interfere with Chinese internal affairs and apologized to Chinese reporters.
Judging from the live video, Kong Linlin was not asking questions and expressing their views, but in the kick.We did not see her sincere debate or communication, but only saw her shouting and abusive to disrupt the order of the meeting.Like Chinese tourists who did not leave at the Swedish hotel not long ago, she did not have the concept of private territory. When she was asked to leave by the owner of the venue, she still insisted on holding the rights in the name of democracy.
There is no doubt that her behavior does not represent the Chinese. Most Chinese people know how to comply with the order of the venue and the gentleman's mouth when attending a meeting at home and abroad.British, Americans, and even people around the world have used various means to disturb the order of the conference for various reasons.For example, it was also at the Conservative Annual Meeting. Today, a comedian mixed into the scene last year, while the British Prime Minister Theresa Middot; Mei gave a list of taxes on the stage when Mei gave a speech on the stage.She is very embarrassed.
From Kong Linlin's Twitter, we can see that her political position is very clear.She has launched a drooling war in Chinese women who supported Hong Kong occupied Central in the same Twitter, and also criticized the evil and fraud in Western media.She also satirized the lion like Britain who only roared but would not hunt.
We can't assume that Kong Linlin's starting point, but we can try to understand her.Some people may not be able to stand it after listening to the view of the whole view that they contrary to their own views.Some people may also choose to act with radical means for certain political purposes or workplace interests.Some people may be bullied from an early age so they are particularly sensitive to criticism of her or her country.No matter what reason, her personal behavior is not difficult to understand, nor is it a big deal.
It is not easy to understand and worthy of discussion. It is not Kong Linlin's motivation, but because the embassy supports her.
It stands to reason that the public statement of any embassy is published after careful thoughts and measurement. Unlike the individual's on -site response, there are issues such as emotional out of control, unclear illegal beating, and no consideration.
Since the embassy's statement is conscious and deliberate behavior, how should we correctly understand the signal released by the embassy to the outside world?
The embassy's freedom of speech was limited and unexpected, asking the organizers to apologize to her.It is puzzling, how can the embassy not be mentioned by the freedom of remarks of the guests of the conference?Why did not maintain the freedom of speech of Chinese and British in the same occasion on the same occasion?
If the embassy has the elasticity of the universal values of freedom of speech, when the embassy publicly expressed the embassy that when the maintenance of multilateralism, free trade, mutual benefit and win -win, and mutual respect, the outside world can rest assuredlyBelieve it?
With dual standards, the United States can do a lot, and therefore is often scolded and hypocritical by the people of other countries.China is working to become a big country recognized in the world. During the comments, China and the United States often mentioned that China has been helpful and the United States has lost help.This is also the price that might be paid for moral elastic standards.The United States is the lesson of the front car.
