For some plot descriptions of the 30,000 miles of Changan in the summer hot animation film this summer, it is not conforming to the real history of China.A movie is not a documentary.Since it is a movie, the creative team should be allowed to do appropriate art processing on the basis of respecting major historical facts, including the necessary art fiction.If the line is scratched everywhere, it is very strict, I am afraid that many movies will not be able to make it.
The Sui and Tang History Society of Luoyang City, Henan Province recently issued a statement on some plots of Changan's 30,000 miles saying, "Li Bai and Du Fu met in Luoyang for the first time, not Changan described in the film", "Du Fu's early life liveIn Luoyang, it is not a Changan described in the film "," 'Three Absoluteness a day' occurred in the Tiansong Temple in Luoyang, not Yangzhou described in the film ", requiring the producer, director, screenwriter and other statements such as error correction and apology.
As soon as this news came out, many netizens paid attention to discussions. Some netizens also questioned the relevant society "touching porcelain", "hotness", "brush the sense of presence".
In this regard, Yangguang.com said in the comments that as a cultural product for the masses, once a film is released, it is natural to accept the various evaluations of the audience.The Sui and Tang History Society of Luoyang City is an organization organized by Luoyang City Social Sciences Federation. It is the main business of studying the historical and culture of the Sui and Tang dynasties. It has certain professionalism and evaluates 30,000 miles related to its professionalism. It was normal.Even if it is true, it is understandable.But it really does not mean that it is strong, and it is not equal to putting on a "contest" posture.In the eyes of the audience, Changan 30,000 miles is a movie, not a documentary, nor is Du Fu's "living note".Since it is a movie, the creative team should be allowed to do appropriate art processing on the basis of respecting major historical facts, including the necessary art fiction.If the line is scratched everywhere, it is very strict, I am afraid that many movies will not be able to make it.
Comments that the view that the film is "easy to mislead the audience, especially the youth audience", it is really worried."Do Chinese teachers and historical teachers speak so many lessons. We have also learned history through various channels, but we still can't resist the 'side effects' by this film?"As for the description of some plots in the film inconsistent with the real history, the so -called "compatriots who affect the birthplace of historical figures and the place of incident" make people sound too far -fetched.
Comments pointed out that everyone's discussion on literary and artistic works can take their own opinions, but we must respect each other and maintain rationality.If you go online, you will have to apologize and apologize, and even take the "intense" action of sending a lawyer's letter, and even provoking a scolding war.It is inevitable that people are speculating and questioning the purpose of this move is art discussion or wanting to be enthusiastic and fighting for IP?
The comments finally called on everyone to be calm, and jointly focused on how to balance the relationship between film and television works to balance historical facts and art fiction, and how to launch more fine works.Such discussions may be more meaningful.
