In response to the nuclear treatment of water in Japan, Wang Wenbin, a spokesman for the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs, said that the nuclear treatment of water is not a precedent adventure and is full of uncertainty.

Wang Wenbin said at a regular press conference on the Ministry of Foreign Affairs on Thursday (July 6) that the Chinese side once again urged the Japanese to stop the Japanese environment and the health of human life.The sea programs do not impose unpredictable risks to the international community.

Wang Wenbin said that Pinghai is a precedent adventure and is full of uncertainty.Japanese data show that nearly 70%of nuclear pollution water processed by the multi -nuclear treatment system still does not meet the emission standards, so there are sufficient reasons for the international community to express concerns and dissatisfaction.

Wang Wenbin said that the Japanese side chose the minimum economic pateling plan, but passed the risk of nuclear pollution to the world.This practice of putting money on human life and health will inevitably be opposed by the international community.

Wang Wenbin said that the Japanese side did not fully negotiate with the international community, especially the interests.Although the Japanese side was forced by domestic and foreign pressure and requested the international atomic energy agencies to conduct review and evaluation, the nuclear treatment of water is the result of the early presets of the Japanese side. The invitation agency to evaluate is just to decorate the facade.

The head director of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Groas, announced on Tuesday (4th) that the final safety review report for the radiation processing water discharge of Fukushima Nuclear Power Station was announced.Gronci said that Japan's emission nuclear treatment of water is safe, but it also states that it cannot be used as a standard for approval policy.

The Chinese Official Media People's Daily published a comment article on Thursday stating that the international atomic energy agency report did not prove the legitimacy of the Fukushima nuclear treatment of water and the sea.The moral responsibility and obligations of the Japanese side should not be the "amulet" for the Japanese side forcibly break through.