(Beijing Comprehensive News) In response to the debate of public opinion on the prevention and control of the epidemic, the former editor -in -chief of the China Global Times, Hu Xi, entered a post for three days, calling on experts to make more voices in the future.The research situation is transparent to the public.

Yili in Xinjiang, Lhasa, Tibet, and other places have recently been controlled by crown diseases and reported shortages such as supplies. In mid -September, the buses of transfers in the informed isolation person in Guizhou also died of 27 people.These accidents once again triggered the debate of Chinese public opinion on zero -epidemic prevention policies.

Hu Xi entered Monday (September 26) on personal Weibo, saying that recently, rational discussions around the epidemic prevention policy have become less, and many experts are silent. At the same time, the fierce slogan on the Internet has increasedAnd each other is opposite each other.

Epidemic prevention discussion is pulled back to scientific rational track

He said that such a public opinion environment is obviously not conducive to coordinating resistance, and it is not conducive to the new changes in the emergence of the epidemic in the local area.

Hu Xijin called on experts to stand up and express more opinions, and strive to re -pull back discussions around the epidemic to the scientific and rational track.

In fact, Hu Xijin has issued a post on the 24th of this month, hoping that experts have made more opinions on the public's most concerned about epidemic prevention issues.He also called on the institutions of the experts not to restrict experts' voices, and ask netizens to lift up their hands, and do not label the experts who express their professional opinions and exert pressure to avoid forming an administrative environment that ultimately disadvantaged experts continue to speak.

If you do not let go, you need to be judged very rationally

The next day, he posted again, claiming to be unable to judge the advantages and disadvantages of "letting go", but China's epidemic prevention did pay economic costs."" ".

What are the benefits and disadvantages of the people, and what are the overall pros and cons of the country? "