Good news, entering China does not need to be isolated; bad news, which has nothing to do with mainland China.

From Monday (September 26), Hong Kong has canceled the entry isolation quarantine measures and opened the external mark to further reply to the original life from the state of resistance.A few days ago, Taiwan announced that entry -free isolation policies are expected to be on the road on October 13.Japan also announced that it will be fully opened to passengers from October 11.South Korea canceled the isolation regulations earlier in June, and no entry is required to complete the vaccination.

In contrast, China still insists on clearing the zero policy and requiring entry passengers to concentrate seven days of isolation, and has become the only major country in Asia, which is still under strict border control.

This comparison has made many Chinese people who originally expected their lives for their early rest of their lives, and Global Times, who has always been keen to lead the topic of social topics, also followed the hot spots.Frankly he was confused about whether China should "let go".

Hu Xijin's Weibo "Four Arrows Connected", the core point of view is roughly two: call on Chinese experts to go to the country in the futurePolitical atmosphere; bluntly that China has paid economic costs for resistance, and more and more people cannot stand the status quo of repeated "static management". I hope that the country will analyze the advantages and disadvantages of openness and explain to the people.For three consecutive days of comments, Hu Xijin also posted the Weibo content of Monday (September 26) into a video of Hu Kan on Weibo, calling on experts to stand up to pull the discussion on epidemic prevention back to the scientific track, and call himself himself, and call himself himself."I am willing to discuss a little bit of discussion on the rational discussion around epidemic prevention."(Video interception)