Taiwan Lai Qingde made the first double speeches in the morning on Thursday (October 10) in the morning. According to statistics, a total of eight "Republic of China" was mentioned, three times more than the former Tsai Ing -wen's 2023 Double Ten speech.

Comprehensive Taiwan Lianhe Daily and Wind Media reports, Lai Qingde's full text of Double Ten speech on Thursday was about 3,000 words, of which a total of 44 "Taiwan", eight times "Republic of China", "Republic of China Taiwan"twice.

Compared with Cai Yingwen's last double speeches during his tenure in 2023, a total of "Taiwan" 37 times, "Republic of China" five times, and "Taiwan of the Republic of China" twice.Lai Qingde mentioned that Taiwan and the "Republic of China" were more frequently than Tsai Ing -wen.

Huang Yanhan, a senior media person, analyzed on Facebook. In addition to the issue of people's livelihood economy, internal affairs and social welfare issues, Lai Qingde's speech also involved the "key questions" of the national identity of cross -strait nationals, including recognition of "Republic of China" 113 113.The history of the year, keeping in mind the "Republic of China" 75 years ago, holding Taiwan Peng Jinma.

He said, when some people are still trapped in the "motherland theory" and for the DPP worry about "how to face independence", Lai Qingde and Tsai Ing -wen have long implemented the "Republic of China, the Republic of China, the Republic of China, the Republic of China, the Republic of China,Taiwan's "route, and moved closer to the" Republic of China ". It has not mentioned that the" Republic of China "has a history of 113 years.

In this speech, Lai Qingde reiterated his views on the cross -strait on -the -way speech on May 20, and further emphasized that the "Republic of China" has taken root in Taiwan.Power represents Taiwan.

He also said, "The Republic of China was exiled in the international community, but the people of Taiwan never exiled themselves."Analysis of people familiar with cross -strait affairs, Lai Qingde's speech repeatedly refers to the UN General Assembly 2758 resolution. The above argument refers to the background of the context involved 53 years ago, removing the old historical view framework.