Zhu Jing, a scholar representative of the Taiwan Trade Organization (WTO) in Taiwan, sighed on Friday (July 14) at a symposium that the WTO specifications have not been able to keep up with the rapid development of science and technology, which has also intensified disputes between the world's top two values.However, Qiu Yiren, the Democratic Progressive Party, who talked about the same scene and talked about, believes that Beijing and Washington are committed to setting up a guardrail to avoid making competition evolving into a final conflict.
The friction between China and Western camps has continued to upgrade recently, which also highlights the polarization trend of the world.The communiqué of the NATO Summit (NATO) Summit this year directly named China to challenge NATO security and value; Beijing criticized NATO in the eastward Asia -Pacific region to stir up the tension in the region and trigger camp confrontation.
Zhu Jingyi, an academician of the Taiwan Central Research Institute, and the current representative of the WTO, Luo Changfa, lawyer Li Baiqing, and Lin Jianzhi, an associate researcher at the Law Institute of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, recently co -discussed the conflict of the two major camps worldwide from the trade dispute involving the WTO.
Zhu Jing proposed when attending a new book symposium in Taipei on the 14th that the current global economic conflict and unfair trade are in the final analysis.
He takes network control as an example, referring to the past international politics does not talk about value, but only talks about benefits. However, with the development of network technology and the value of network control between the country, economic conflicts will occur.The norms of the WTO have long been out of date, and cannot keep up with the development of science and technology. It cannot resolve the trade conflict derived from the differences in network control, which has exacerbated the battle for value.
Zhu Jingyi takes the Antitrust case as an example. It means that Huawei is a representative company of China and Communications, but there are no similar companies in the United States. If you want to think that the United States has the same company as Huawei, you may have to put Apple, Intel, Intel,Corporal, Cisco and other companies have merged, but this is absolutely impossible in the fair trading law in the United States, because the value that the United States believes in is the "mutual checks and balances" among companies.
He believes that these cases can clearly see the difference in value and how to evolve into trade conflicts.
Zhang Zhongmou, the founder of TSMC, also pointed out in early July that the current globalization has been redefined as "" in the country's security, not harmful to the country's current or future technology economy, allow domestic enterprises to make profits abroad.Foreign industries and services are also allowed to enter the country. "Can he be regarded as globalization under such evolution?
Qiu Yiren, who had served as Secretary -General of the Taiwan Government during the Chen Shuibian government, said at the symposium on the 14th that he agreed to Zhang Zhongmou to some extent.Because the ideal of globalization is the regardless of the system, and it is purely from the perspective of a free market. It hopes that it is the same free market in the world, but this premise no longer exists. "Slowly differentiation is a trend that cannot be stopped."
Although the Sino -US high -level meetings have been frequently met between China and the United States.
Wang Yi, director of the Office of the Foreign Affairs Working Committee of the Communist Party of China on Thursday (13th) in Indonesia on Thursday (13th), when talks with US Secretary of State Brillings, China and the United States should start from specific things to resolutely prevent the "gray rhino" and properly handle "Black Swan ", completely moved away the" block tiger "to accumulate conditions for the stable accumulation of Sino -US relations and eliminate interference.
The US press release emphasizes that this talk aims to maintain open communication channels, and responsibly manages competition by reducing the risks of misunderstandings and misjudgment.
In this regard, Qiu Yiren said that although the fundamental conclusion of the battle between the two strong values tends to be a zero -sum game, it does not mean that the two worlds are not exchanged with each other. "That is impossible."
He believes that the United States has recently interacted with Beijing, and both sides are setting up guardrails and control conflicts.It is precisely because both sides are naive that this level of interaction can solve the fundamental zero -sum game, so both sides will work to avoid the final conflict of the second -level game.
