Source: Hong Kong 01 website
Recently, the news of Xiao Zhan, a male star in mainland China, seemed to be almost abrupt.Xiao Zhan was resisted because fans reported the same humanistic author. From endorsement advertising to film and television works, netizens have said that they will not buy or watch.Behind Xiao Zhan's dispute, the public discourse space has not yet matured.
The fuse of this incident is a fans published on the fellow articles published on Archive of Our Own (referred to as AO3), causing different online social circles to fight. Overseas platforms were closed in China. FinallyAfter the end of the commission, the meal circle culture and the concentrated reporting behavior consultation opinions.
Tongren are used by Japanese anime culture, referring to people and fellows with comrades.Fan people's creation refers to self -creation, or self -affected by business, or autonomous creation, which has greater creative freedom than commercial creation.To put it simply, it refers to the enthusiasts of literature, animation, film and television and other works. Based on the original work, they use different expression methods to perform secondary creative outputs of the characters, storyline, and background settings of the original work.
Large -scale offer
AO3 is the creation and storage platform of non -profit fan novels under the United States.Because the platform was reported by Xiao Zhan's concentrated reports on February 29, it was not necessary to turn over the wall, and it can be directly viewed, so it is not only a world -renowned related related work website, stored nearly 5.5 million works, but also concentrated a large number of mainland fellow novelsCreators and readers provide free and fertile soil for the creation of their fellow works.In 2019, the AO3 works library won the Hugo Award for Best Related Works Award with amazing results above the second and third total votes.Therefore, the AO3 provides an important free development soil for the mainland's ecosystem.For example, when the AO3 cannot be accessed, fellow writers can only pass the works through Baidu web disk and other methods, which greatly reduces the sharing and communication of the work, making it difficult for the work to save.
The domestic drama of the Love Festival of the same -sex festival has won the two male leaders of Xiao Zhan and Wang Yibo.The fall is the second creation of the emotional line of the two male lead.Unexpectedly, Xiao Zhan's role setting in the article aroused the dissatisfaction of its fans.From February 25, Xiao Zhan fans called the vast number of victims who were written into humanities to speak, and launched a centralized report attack.They reported to the State Cyberspace Office and the Anti -African offices from the National Network Information Office and the anti -agreed non -office through telephone, sending letters, emails, etc., and the people involved were not only the author who had fallen, but also many other similar authors.On the last February 29th, mainland netizens could no longer board the AO3 platform. AO3 Baidu Post Bar, Station B. Same content, and LOFTER writer content was equally affected, and large areas were sealed.
Xiao Zhan Studio apologies
This naturally caused the creators of Europe, America, Japan and South Korea, Anime, Humanities, and Yanmei to reveal their poles and oppose Xiao Zhan's fan reporting creative platform.Not only did Xiao Zhan Studio apology, the Internet Culture and Industry Committee of the China Cultural Management Association also had to end the fire and publish#不 不 不#What do you think of this?Regarding the rice circle culture on the Internet, and centralized reporting behavior.But people do not buy it. After all, it is easy to destroy the soil of creation, and it is not easy to build, and many creative works can no longer be found.
Obviously, how to deal with the country behind this incident is also related to the country's air -to -air level.Tongren's creation, especially when it involves sexual orientation, some illegal occupations such as prostitutes such as prostitutes, have a large gray space.However, as many users of the AO3 platform have said, from the Chinese Red Mansions to Dream of French sheep fat balls, eroticism, prostitutes, etc. can become classic creative themes, and they cannot be judged by the works involved in these issues.Contraindications.
Why face a variety of sounds
Therefore, relevant Chinese departments need to review the mechanism of creative review.It is undeniable that in the past, it was stricter to review this in the past. For example, the cleavage of the actress who was cut in the legend of Wu Mei Niang, which made people cry; for example, the camera that was cut in the color ring, some thought it affected the beauty and narrative of the story;The rough review of keywords on the Internet platform has made a smile that buying bamboo shoots into ** bamboo shoots#8943;#8943; Due, is the network and creation of the Internet, but is it appropriate to be rough at this stage?Can the mainland consider setting up a more appropriate level of work level division to balance the free creation and cultural health of the work?These are the reflection that Xiao Zhan brought to us after the incident.
On the other hand, behind this incident also reveals the communication issues of different opinions in public discourse space.In the past, the language violence of the fan circle was criticized, and many fans realized that this behavior was a rudeness that was not recognized. After discrediting their idols, they went to another extreme MDash; mdash; report.By reporting, the public power of the official media and the network management department to eliminate the voice that makes itself unpleasant, and has formed a new pink circle culture.However, they did not realize that whether it was the hustle and bustle of scolding or silent reports, but the different forms of the party's differences were trying to monopoly monopolize public discourse space and eliminate this space.What's more, a report aimed at eliminating dissidents. In order to succeed, he often does not follow the principles of the argument, and the outline is launched to mention the height of all issues to the height of major principles.In this case, the report must rose to the height of infringing the physical and mental health of minors, to break the Internet and social atmosphere.And such reports are becoming more and more normal, which will inevitably erode the diverse expression and creation of public space.From scolding to reports, people still have a long way to go from one extreme to the other end, how to coexist and communicate with niche culture and disgraceful people in public discourse space.
In some cases, the dispute is submitted to a third -party professional processing.Just as the mainland writer Jiang Nan was based on 65 characters of Jin Yong's novels, he created a campus -themed work in the second time. Mr. Jin Yong suspected of infringement of the novel, so he filed a lawsuit.After the trial, the court believed that because the teenagers here were completely different from the original and the relationship between the characters, the character's personality characteristics and relationships were completely different, it was not enough to infringe, but because of improper competition, it would compensate 1.68 million yuan.
However, in more cases, the disputes and differences in public discourse space do not need to go to the court's lawsuit, but to test how we face the conflict of multiple sounds, and whether we can communicate rationally and coexist rationally.In fact, even in Hong Kong, there are many netizens reporting the content on social platforms because of their political stance, reducing the exposure of the content of another position.Although the reporting war has not appeared, how to make public discourse space more mature, and it is more exciting, it is a problem that must be thought about cross -regional society.
