Yu Zeyuan: What problems can the Li Wenliang incident find out?

Wuhan doctor Li Wenliang's public opinion storm caused by the death of the 2019 new coronary virus (referred to as the new coronary virus) is still continuing.The death of a person's death is so stirred up, it can be said that it was extremely rare after Deng Xiaoping's death in 1997.

China's official response to public opinion this time can be described as rapid.On the day of Li Wenliang's death on February 7, the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection issued a news that with the approval of the Central Committee, the National Supervision Commission decided to send an investigation team to Wuhan City, Hubei Province to conduct a comprehensive investigation on the relevant issues involving Dr. Li Wenliang reported by the masses.

From the central level, a comprehensive investigation of a deceased who did not have an official position was intended to brightly understand the attitude towards the Li Wenliang incident to the outside world.Faced with the public opinion of boiling and full of sky, this attitude allows high -level seniors to avoid the center of the storm in morality.In addition, the official media and the Wuhan Municipal Government have expressed their condolences and regrets to Li Wenliang. Li Wenliang's parents and wives also publicly denied that some unrealistic rumors. Li Wenliang's inspirational indignation has not yet constituted a threat to social stability.

Li Wenliang was just an ordinary doctor during his lifetime. He likes food, likes to travel, and likes to chase dramas.The reason why he received such high attention was because on December 30, 2019, he posted a seven cases of SARS (Shas) in the South China Seafood Fruit Market in the WeChat group of his classmates, and reminded everyone not to pass out and let family and loved onesPay attention to prevent.

Li Wenliang may not have thought at the time that the new crown virus epidemic he had warned soon swept away Wuhan, Hubei and China, and made the world highly tense.

In fact, Li Wenliang is not the first person to discover the new crown virus epidemic, nor is it the first person to report and require official vigilance.On December 26 last year, Director Zhang Jixian, Director of the Department of Respiratory and Critical Medicine of Hubei Province Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital, received special cases. He first judged and insisted on reporting the pneumonia epidemic of new virus infection.It is based on her report that on January 1, 2020, Wuhan officially closed the South China Seafood Market.

For professional sensitivity, Li Wenliang and other eight doctors spread news about the new epidemic in the WeChat group around December 30, but unfortunately, Wuhan officials did not take further measures in preventing and controlling the epidemic broadcast.On January 2nd, the Wuhan Health and Health Commission notified that the phenomenon of people was obviously passed on and no infection was found.On January 3, the local public security organs summoned Li Wenliang and others to the police station for criticism and education on the grounds of publishing unrealistic remarks on the Internet.

Obviously, the official Wuhan official at that time had ignoring or fluke in the epidemic.Compared with the prevention and control epidemic, they are more concerned about the so -called stability, creating a good atmosphere for the upcoming local people's congresses and the CPPCC conference, and experts from the China Centers for Disease Control and Prevention subsequently mistakenly judge the seriousness of the epidemic.As a result, Hubei Province and all Chinese people quickly paid a painful price.

These days, people who are troubled by the epidemic will inevitably think: How did this disaster come from?Why did Li Wenliang and other warning outbound whistlers be suppressed and trained?

Li Wenliang's death finally detonated the indignation of the public accumulation for many days.Many people venture and praise Li Wenliang and vent their grievances on related parties. Some people have raised the Li Wenliang incident to the institutional level to express their political demands.The official vigilance is whether the public's grievances will be used by the hostile forces at home and abroad and become a tool to threaten China's political security.

To prevent resentment, the official must give the public an explanation of the MDash; MDash; this is also the purpose of the high -level launching a comprehensive investigation involving Li Wenliang's related issues.

In this context, the investigation of the Li Wenliang incident is obviously not limited to why the public security organs must summon Li Wenliang, but also to find out whether there is a power intervention outside the public security organs behind the public security organs.

In all fairness, Li Wenliang's motivation for warning is not complicated.After learning about the epidemic information from other channels, he sent it to the WeChat classmate to remind everyone to be careful, but he was reposted to the Internet by others, causing him to be rumored and was trained.Although the warning information from Li Wenliang is not completely accurate, it is by no means a rumor.Especially the facts later proved that the time of warning of Li Wenliang and others was the golden opportunity to prevent and control the spread of the epidemic.If the official measures were taken at that time, Wuhan may not need to seal the city, and the entire China would not have to accompany the tie.

It can be expected that the investigation will be rehabilitated to Li Wenliang's commandment, and the person instructed by Li Wenliang will be investigated, and relevant personnel who have the responsibility of the Li Wenliang incident may also be punished.The Li Wenliang incident may be the beginning of the proliferation of the Wuhan epidemic.

It should be pointed out that in the face of such a huge disaster, no matter the results of the investigation of the Li Wenliang incident, the responsibilities of the relevant persons in charge of Wuhan, Hubei Province, and the National Health Commission of China cannot be exempted.The disadvantages of the system must also be considered and improved.Otherwise, the public's resentment is difficult to calm down, and the official credibility is difficult to stop loss.