In 2003, SARS broke out. After 17 years, the coronary virus came out again.The virus has spread throughout China and spreads to many countries through the multinational travel of the carrier.
In order to prevent further transmission of the virus, from 10:00 on January 23, the city's public transportation was stopped from operating from 10:00 on January 23. There are no special circumstances, and Wuhan is prohibited.Fengcheng's determination to be determined to be a large population -level city, which can be said to be at a cost.
On January 28, the National Forestry and Grassland Bureau, together with the Emergency Notice and Announcement issued by the General Administration of Market Supervision and the Ministry of Agricultural and Rural Affairs: The most severe wild animal control measures were announced during the epidemic, and the sale of wild animals for artificial breeding venues was fully prohibited.All forms of wild animal transactions.
Since it is the government's announcement, the author believes that there should be no ambiguity.The author's simple understanding of this announcement, or the feeling of the announcement is that the special period of the epidemic is not so strict with the control of wild animals.
In 2003, although there was no 100%confirmation, all circles generally believed that it was caused by eating civet.For this coronary virus, everyone points to wild animals traded in the Wuhan South Seafood market in Wuhan.Before an authoritative agency releases other sources of infection, we can think that wild animals are the source of coronary virus.
The author does not want to repeat the importance of wild animals to our biodiversity on the earth. It has long proved that wildlife is not more nutritious and not more delicious than the pork, sheep, chickens, chickens, chickens, chickens, chickens, chickens, chickens, but also very delicious, but they must bear very much.Big risk.The coronary virus epidemic has given the world, and of course, it is not necessary to bring so much trouble to 1.4 billion people in China.
The Chinese government is determined to block a large population -level city, isn't it determined that the idea of sealing some people to eat wild animals is determined?Before the outbreak of the epidemic, the red -red and bold wild animal transactions in Wuhan's South Seafood market in Wuhan had to let people conclude this conclusion: The pain that Shas in 2003 brought you to everyone, in some people's memories, have already rememberedForgot all.
Over the years, the Chinese government has spent the hard work to improve the image of the country and eliminate the prejudice of foreigners in the Chinese. However, it has to be said that in the aspect of eating wild animals, the Chinese have reduced their own image for their own image.
Is the outbreak of the two outbreaks now, isn't it enough to allow the Chinese government to permanently prohibit eating wild animals in the next permanently?If there is still some scruples about this ban, is these scruples over the city?If some people think that the author misunderstand the meaning of the notice, then the notice should be added to: after the epidemic, all wild animal transactions are also prohibited.
Personally, I hope to see such no ambiguous ban in the next notice.
(The author works at Dadal, France, is responsible for market development in Asia in Special Polymers)
