Wangbao Society Review
Tsai Ing -wen was selected for re -election, and cross -strait relations were even more turbulent. On the one hand, Tsai Ing -wen took the initiative to attacked and proposed the initiative of cross -strait dialogue. On the other hand, it was the latest move from the mainland in the principle of China.... During the visit to Myanmar, they jointly issued a joint statement with the Myanmar side, which mentioned that Myanmar reiterated its firm pursuit of a Chinese policy and believed that Taiwan was an inseparable part of the People's Republic of China.
A stone aroused thousands of waves. This expression immediately stirred up the rebound in Taiwan society, and even the Kuomintang issued a statement to express his objections.Although there are serious differences in the issue of unification in Taiwan, there is a high consensus on the issue of Taiwan that is not affiliated to the People's Republic of China.For the people of Taiwan, even if the unity of identity is not the same as accepting the rule of the People's Republic of China, it is to find a unified model of the cross -strait peer dignity. As for the maintenance of the status quo and independence, even this is unacceptable.
There is also its own political correctness inside the mainland, and there is also their own insistence on the cross -strait issues. However, in terms of phased claims, it can still be elastic according to the needs of the objective situation and the response of Taiwanese society.The so -called new three paragraphs, in the past, insisted that the People's Republic of China was the only legal government representing China. Now emphasizing that cross -strait belongs to one middle, implied the meaning of cross -strait peers.After the understanding of complexity, it is noticed that it is necessary to deal with cross -strait positioning issues in a certain vague way to avoid being too aggressive on the problem of cross -strait relations.In the past, the mainland still knew that we could not take action unilaterally on this sensitive issue, but now they do the opposite. As a result, it can only further stimulate the anti -Chinese mood of Taiwanese society.
More importantly, the international community has not selected the side team on this issue. In the past, when foreign countries signed diplomatic documents with the mainland, even if foreign countries supported or did not oppose the principles of the first China, they would not explain on the issue of cross -strait sovereign ownership.At most, it is recognized that Taiwan is part of China, and it will not indicate that Taiwan is part of the People's Republic of China.However, this statement of Myanmar's statement obviously means that the past processing method has been greatly changed, and it means that the mainland not only does not intend to make concessions on cross -strait dispute issues.In this case, the vigilance of Taiwanese society has naturally risen.
However, it proves that this is a oolong, because according to the English version of the English text disclosed by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Myanmar on the official Facebook account, Myanmar still only agrees that Taiwan is part of China, and does not mention the People's Republic of China.Myanmar is still like before, and it will not be selected on the issue of orthodox disputes on both sides of the strait.In this way, this incident became a text game played by the mainland. The mainland stole the concept on very serious occasions, and it also caused the dislike of Taiwanese society in vain.
As many critics say, this practice in the mainland is purely internal propaganda, and even some self -deception, which is not a big country.In terms of major serious issues such as cross -strait positioning, there are fundamental differences between the two sides of the strait, and there is no consensus on both sides of the two sides of the statement of the principles of the first China. In fact, after cross -strait relations have entered the deep -water zone, how to deal with the factual problems of the Republic of China still exist in the Republic of China.And the relationship between the relationship between the Republic of China and the People's Republic of China is a difficult political issue. It tests the political wisdom of the main administrative people on both sides of the strait and cannot tolerate a little bit.
On such a sensitive issue, the mainland wants to make the international community through text games to support the illusion of Taiwan's support for Taiwan. It will only make Taiwanese society more unable to identify with the mainland.Any substantial help.
This time, the oolong incident was actually a reminder to the mainland that the general public opinion of Taiwan society has clearly showed that the mainland needs to analyze and judge more carefully and put forward effective countermeasures.In particular, the people of Taiwan not only care about economic benefits, but also attach great importance to the metaphysical issues such as sovereignty and dignity.The recognition of the Taiwanese people in the Republic of China is both legal and emotional. Regardless of whether the mainland does not accept it, the public opinion of Taiwanese society is so presented that it is difficult to avoid or should not avoid it.The mainland must not just want to rely on the policy of benefiting Taiwan to fight for the people's hearts, and it must also face the reality, and the prescription may be prescribed.
The mainland has entered a middle -class society. ... Priority tasks are the great rejuvenation of poverty alleviation and the Chinese nation. Under this goal, the unification of the two sides of the strait must be based on the consistency of the mind.Political differences on both sides of the strait are temporarily difficult to solve. The schemes are still based on accumulation of goodwill and mutual trust. Xu Tu resumes official interaction. The two sides of the strait must be based on large pattern thinking to avoid small actions.
