Su Mohan, director of the Asian Research Unit of the King's Research Center of Saudi Arabia, said that the elites of the Middle East country described Chinese society as an exaggeration to the authority or discipline.Contradictions and turmoil.
The exchanges between the Middle East and China have deepened with China's rise in recent years. Some Middle East scholars believe that some Arab countries regard the Chinese governance model as a reference example, which may not be interested in its actual governance experience.In order to prove the necessity of implementing centralized governance policies after the Spring Revolution of Arabia.
Scholars believe that the Middle East country should learn from the crisis consciousness of the CCP's governors, rather than the right to depend on its own rule.
Mohammed Turki Al-Sudairi, the head of the Asian Research Unit of Saudi Arabia, was held at a forum held by the Middle East Institute of the National University of Singapore yesterday (January 16) at the Middle East.National experience topics, published the above views.
Su Mohan said that with the rise of China in recent years, many elites of the Persian Gulf Arab national elites have begun to contact China more seriously and imagine it as a successful example of national governance.
Based on the exchange and summary of people close to the people close to the Middle East decision -making circle, these countries generally believe that China's successful governance model has several characteristics, including centralized power and management from top to bottom.Features are docile and discipline.
It is believed that the Middle East countries should refer to the awareness of the CCP's crisis
However, Su Mohan believes that these are actually misunderstandings about China's actual situation in modern Chinese history and internal affairs, especially after the reform and opening up in 1978.For example, in the 1980s and 1990s, one of the characteristics of China's national governance was actually reforming through decentralization, and more space for lower -level cadres was given to different policies on different policies.
He also believes that it is an exaggeration to describe Chinese society as an informed authority or discipline, because Chinese society has always been revolutionary since ancient times, and there has always been a considerable degree of contradiction and turbulence.
He believes that these misunderstandings of the Arab national elite are because they are mainly in contact with the West and lack their understanding of East Asia.What's more, these elites may not be interested in the actual grassroots governance experience in China, but they hope to build an ideal successful Chinese model to prove the necessity of some centralized governance policies after the Spring Revolution of the Arabia in 2011.
Compared with the so -called centralized governance model, Su Mohan believes that the Middle East countries should refer to the crisis awareness of the CCP's ruling.
He was further said in an interview with Lianhe Morning Post that the CCP's governors have always had a sense of crisis. They continue to identify the possible roots of crisis and turmoil, trying to prevent these crises from detonation.For example, the General Secretary of the Communist Party of China ... In January last year, it held a special seminars to prevent and resolve major risks, emphasizing that the CCP must be highly alert to the black swan incident and prevent the gray rhino incident.
Su Mohan believes that many political, economic, and social reforms that China have launched in the past 30 years are from fear of unstable or turmoil that may occur, which has enhanced the toughness and response capabilities of the Chinese Communist regime.
In the Middle East, Su Mohan pointed out that although many national leaders also have a sense of crisis, they still generally treat their own dominance for granted.He believes that if these ruler can cultivate a sufficient sense of crisis, it may be helpful for the situation of the Spring of Arabia.
Chinese scholars: can learn from East Asia Regional Cooperation Mechanism
Pan Guang, director of the Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences, who is in the same field, proposed that the Chinese model may not be applicable to the Middle East countries, but if you look at East Asia, the Middle East country still has a reference, especially in various regional cooperation in East Asia.mechanism.
For example, he said that 10+3 mechanisms in China, Japan and South Korea have a stable 10+3 mechanism.Although there are also Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) in the Middle East, there are many controversies between member states.He believes that a variety of stable regional cooperation mechanisms must be established, which is one of the reasons why Asia has not warned for many years.
