Early
Northern Remember
2020 is the end of the year of a well -off society and poverty alleviation set by the highest level in China.The Chinese Communist Party vowed to announce the establishment of a well -off society in an all -round way on the occasion of the 100 years of the founding of the party. One of the measurement standards is whether it can eliminate the absolutely poverty.Poverty alleviation is a highlight of the work of various local governments this year.
Right now, although the pressure of the Sino -US trade war is still high in the top, the issues of Hong Kong are far from being resolved, and the risks on both sides of the strait are constantly accumulating, but compared with the solemn commitment of the CCP of the Chinese Communist Party and the solemn commitment to the people, external issues actually have to be actually necessaryStand on the side.As officials from all over the country stepped up the end of poverty alleviation, all kinds of ridicule and criticism also followed.
It is said that on Tuesday (7th), the Standing Committee of the Jiangsu Provincial People's Congress met. The director of the Provincial Poverty Alleviation Office reported that in the past four years, Jiangsu has achieved 2.54 million people from poverty alleviation, and the poverty alleviation rate has reached more than 99.99%. At present, there are only six households in the province.17 people did not get rid of poverty.
This number immediately exploded on the Internet.Some netizens have questioned the official figures fraud, and they also question how the official can accurately count 17 people.Some Weibo Bo Lord initiated in Jiangsu's leftover 17 people who were not poverty alleviation. Did you get rid of poverty?The voting attracted nearly 70,000 people voting claiming that they had not escaped poverty.
Some replies help to explain that the government counts the poverty according to whether the annual income exceeds the poverty line.Jiangsu Province officially responded that the national poverty line of China was an annual income of 4,000 yuan (RMB, S $ 777). As a strong economic province, Jiangsu has taken the initiative to increase the standard to 6,000 yuan.As for 17 people, it is because according to the requirements of precision poverty alleviation, the data of the poor requires accurate data. Furthermore is also a dynamic process, and the data is changing every day.
Some people also asked, since the poor are so left, why not pay 6,000 yuan in cash per person, and immediately meet the standards for poverty alleviation?Some people also criticize China's poverty lines too low, neither realistic nor grounding, is the book that allows officials to show off poverty alleviation. Chinese -style poverty alleviation is a great leap for poverty alleviation under the leadership of political achievements.
Earlier, there was a news police that made people laugh.
On January 2nd, some netizens reported to the Yulin City Police from Guangxi Province to receive such mobile phone text messages. The content is: Hello, the state detected that you are the severe poverty. In order to ensure the national poverty alleviation goal in 2020, pleasePoints to the local public security bureau on time to accept the death penalty.
The severely poor people have been surrendered by the Public Security Bureau, and will they be executed?IntersectionObviously, some people spoofed rumors.
However, the online public opinion field is so ridiculous to poverty alleviation, reflects the multi -layer doubts of the people. Among them, there is both disdain of the standards for the identification of poverty, and there is no trust in the official way of poverty alleviation.Doubt, it is believed that more digital fraud and formalism will be triggered.
According to China's current price level, the annual income exceeds 4,000 yuan. It is difficult to provide meals in the city. I am afraid that the food costs are not enough, but from another perspective, if there are still many people in China's remote areas, the annual income is less than 4,000 yuan.From the perspective of social fairness and justice, it really cannot be said.
As for the author's personal interviews and several colleagues in the newspaper, China has invested a lot of funds to poverty alleviation and improve public services and infrastructure in remote areas.Change.According to official report data, millions of cadres have been sent to poverty alleviation in poor areas in poverty alleviation in poverty alleviation in the past few years.
However, the work effectiveness of poverty alleviation cadres is indeed limited by the quality of the parties and whether it has the ability to promote the development of rural development.The Hong Kong Duan Media recently reported deeply that a Chinese medicine doctor in a hospital in Guangxi was sent to poverty alleviation in rural areas. He wanted to drive the poverty -stricken households to raise chickens. As a result, he did not master the technology.
Such absurd stories reflect the disadvantages of poverty alleviation systems that drive the economy from top to bottom and politics.In the instruction poverty alleviation campaign, some large enterprises have also been required to share the responsibility of poverty alleviation. For example, a large number of poverty -stricken household handicrafts without market sales are equal to the relief of disguise. How long can this relief last?It is also a question that cannot be ignored.
Some critics believe that more efficient and sustainable poverty alleviation methods rely on market mechanisms to develop economic and productive forces in depth.This statement is reasonable, but I asked China's reform and opening up for decades, but there are still 70 million people who live in the corner where the light of the market cannot be shone. If there is no special method for support, when can they get out of the absolute poverty?
Of course, tens of millions of people should be removed from poverty in the specified time, including trial and error costs and costs, and whether they can continue to worry.But for Chinese -style poverty alleviation, it is not appropriate to treat it just with ridicule and irony.In the final analysis, before a better and more feasible way of poverty alleviation, the Chinese government's original intention and effort to improve the life of the absolute poor people is worthy of objective treatment and affirmation.
