Source: Hong Kong 01
2019 will be completed, and it is also ended for the 2010s.In this era, Hong Kong did not have many real development in various senses. Not only did the economic and people's livelihood repeatedly missed the timing of reform, but the development of political system was stagnant under the non -compromised populist thought.If you want to draw a symbol for the political bureau of Hong Kong in the past ten years, it will never be a complete end, but it can only be a helpless number. Looking back at the alternate point of the new era, in 2010, Hong Kong was just at the crossroads of the development of political system. The degree of society in which society expanded the democracy of the Chief Executive and the Legislative Council election in 2012.In May of the same year, three core members of the Democratic Party, He Junren, Liu Huiqing and Zhang Wenguang, entered the China Union to meet with the central government in Hong Kong, and negotiated political reform.The political reform plan proposed by the Democratic Party was finally adopted. In 2012, the Legislative Council election added five direct election seats in the Legislative Council and five super district conference seats elected by voters voted by voters in Hong Kong. This is the first and the only example of the success of political reform since the return.However, the political system has been promoted to move forward, but it does not bring aura to the Democratic Party, but instead in exchange for the fame of selling Hong Kong.In the future, the entire democratic school seemed to be affected by the non -compromised populist thoughts. Hong Kong's political scenes were surging, but no movement could truly promote the development of political system. Five years ago, society walked to another crossroads of political reform, and occupied Central in the first demand of the general election special demands. However, after 79 days of vigorous exercise, the society not only failed to condense consensus, but deepened political opposition.The following year, when the Pan -Democratic faction refused to live in the pioneer, the Legislative Council finally rejected the Chief Executive's Election Plan made by the SAR Government at 8.31 decided by the National People's Congress. In the last year of the 2010s, the dispute over the amendment of the fugitive regulations stirred up a thousand waves, and blindly separated the trend of populist politics in Hong Kong and the Mainland.Hold.After ten years of dreaming of Yangzhou dreams, the loud political slogans are easy to make people excited, but not many people calm down and think about why Hong Kong's political system development is stunned, and how to truly take the first step to restart political reform. Political reform can not help avoid zero -time situation overnight Ten years ago, with the support of veteran Situhua, the Democratic Party entered the China United Nations Office, which promoted the political reform in 2012 and brought about the progress of democracy.Unfortunately, many passers -by who strive for democracy, including the Kitan Party and radicals who have always opposed to accepting the Pioneer Pioneer Political Reform Plan and insisting on fighting for a full -scale general election.Selling Hong Kong and Dark Communities on the critical time.As a result, the Democratic Party paid political costs for this. First, the member of the founding party, Zheng Jiafu, retired from the party. In 2012, the Legislative Council election was punished by voters, from nine minus to six seats.This has gradually formed a taboo in the non -construction circle. The communication between politicians and central officials is equivalent to selling Hong Kong people. It is surrenderism. Only the so -called persistence that refuses to concessions is true democracy. However, not compromised but failed to bring a bright way to Hong Kong politics.As early as the end of 2007, the central government believed that the timing was immature, and it was decided that the special election in 2012 will not be produced for the time being, causing political reform to be deadlocked.Former Democratic Party Chairman Li Zhuming, the Citizen Party and Socialist, in order to strive for a double -selection in order to strive for a referendum in 2010.This method of refusing to compromise with unilateral pressure can not only let the central government release for political reform, but the referendum has also declared failure at a low vote rate.However, in the next ten years, under this ideological leadership, the Pan -Democratic School is increasingly negotiated with the government, the establishment, and the central government. This resolute attitude is clearly reflected in the social discussion of the 2016 Legislative Council and the special election plan in 2017.As a result, some politicians advocated the use of people's activities to put pressure on the government in order to seek political ways. In the end, they even advocated illegal righteousness, holding the society attempt to force the Hong Kong government and the central government to fully allow the demands of dual -election of the Chief Executive and the Legislative Council.When you come to the anti -repair example, the demonstrators not only call the five major demands, but also lack one indispensable, but also claim to have no large platform, pushing the uncompromising spirit to a higher peak. In comparison, what practical improvement of the political operation of Hong Kong's political system is never compromised?The fact is that no one can deny that the Democratic Party entered the China United Nations Office that year, and found a pragmatic way for the political reform deadlock, so that the entire society enjoys the dividend of the election seats and expand the voters' foundation in 2012.The local faction can be promoted to the Legislative Council in the 2016 Legislative Council election, which has nothing to do with the extra seats.In November of this year, after the victory of the Pan -Democratic School's victory in the district council, how to coordinate the super district meeting seats in the next year's Legislative Council election will be regarded as an important affairs by all parties. The struggle thinking is difficult to open up the roads of all parts must do business In 2010, the three Democrats veterans who entered the China Union Office were recently looked back at the past when they were interviewed in Hong Kong 01. They did not deny the significance of negotiation in politics.In fact, they have experienced the establishment of the system and the Pan -People's Eight Party Alliance as early as the beginning of their return, and jointly put pressure on the government to promote the people's livelihood policy. Liu Huiqing was the first person to propose an alliance that year.It is difficult for all three people to hide their disappointment in the political difficulties that Hong Kong have fallen into the ice, but each has different understanding. Hong Kong has been responsible for the development of the political system to today's non -concession and difficult return.The pan -people camp's attitude towards politics is not a stumbling block for the current political difficulties to find a way out.A number of Pan -civilian parties are subject to populism, and they can only be led by the people's conditions.Hong Kong has a strong yellow and blue confrontation now. It is just an exacerbation of social tear and causing people with different opinions to fall into the traps where you die and I live, and eliminate the doorway to negotiate and communicate. On the other side, from the central government to the SAR government to the establishment of the party, it is difficult to blame society.Needless to say, the past policy of governance in the central government was not perfect. It has been a long -term thinking understanding and handling of one country, two systems that have not been committed by well water, and failed to actively create positive conditions for the integration of Lugang.Hong Kong's duties, sitting on the accumulation of social contradictions; the Central China Agency, as an agency of the Central Committee, failed to do a good job of bridge. Instead, he took the initiative to help gangs and encourages the political struggle of Hong Kong society.When the Hong Kong economy was trapped or political conflicts, the central and Hong Kong government simply thought that relying on the Hong Kong policy to release water from Hong Kong, which was enough to solve the friction and despised the deep -seated structure.When dealing with political disputes, the government often treats non -construction factions with contradictions between enemies and me, and is blindly suppressed by politics. As a result, it is just expanding differences. Get rid of ideological shackles and regain the beginning of the heart to promote reform In the final analysis, the fundamental differences of Hong Kong's political disputes are the understanding of one country, two systems.One country and two systems are a whole, but the focus of the central government and Hong Kong society is different.The central government emphasizes the fundamental principle of one country, emphasizes that Hong Kong's promotion of the development of political system in accordance with the Basic Law must be gradual, and at the same time, it also requires the constitutional responsibility stipulated by the Hong Kong society to perform the Basic Law; Hong Kong society focuses on the differences between the two systems.One country, two systems are an innovative system without precedent. During the implementation process, problems and even conflict are natural. However, we must find a way for Hong Kong politics and go out of society to tear and work.While emphasizing the power of comprehensive governance, the central government should also look at the concerns of Hong Kong society and respond positively; Hong Kong society must clearly understand the regulation of the political development of the Basic Law on the political development of Hong Kong.To the Chief Executive's selection, there must be a widely representative nomination committee; we must not only mention the rights, but ignore the constitutional responsibility of Article 23 of the Basic Law. It is about to start in the 2020s. It is foreseeable that in the future, Hong Kong will still be a lot of affairs: anti -repair examples have not been completely flat; newly elected district councilors will be new on January 1;However, as the regional power has experienced a large shuffle, different parties have fist; even the nomination committee of the special election in 2022 has become a battlefield.Many Hong Kong people want to change their hearts, but they cannot have only one cavity of blood, and continue to have the political movement model that cannot be legal in the past ten years. The experience of the past ten years has told Hong Kong people that the solidified thinking and political operations that refuse to compromise and ignore the actual political framework are rejected by the constraints of ideology.EssenceWhen returning to politics, politicians must have the courage to abandon the meaningless air consumptionThe awareness of the struggle is based on citizens and social welfare, and the reform is pragmatic.Hong Kong's political development has been wrapped in the past ten years. If you do n’t think about changes, even if you have been a few more years, I am afraid that you can only consume light in endless disputes, and how many decade will Hong Kong people have to wait?
