01 Viewpoint
If there is no accident, the district council election will be held on November 24. Under the heavy political atmosphere of society, the pan -democratic camp qualification (DQ) ripples have not appeared.The situation of the current Legislative Council of the Legislative Council, which is regarded as the self -determination, is the most interesting.He was DQ when he was running for the villages of the countryside at the end of last year. When the outside world speculated that he could repeat itself this time, he eventually was released.It is not advocated and not advocated that Hong Kong independence is an option for the future of Hong Kong people.
Zhu Kaidi obviously did not really give up his position on his self -determination, because he acknowledged in the media interview that based on the existing election system, if he did not change, he did not need to run, suggesting that changes were forced.However, in any case, his situation does have a deep province MDASH; advocating Hong Kong independence or self -determination, or considering Hong Kong independence as an option, it is impossible to participate in political elections within the system at all.In this case, politicians either accept the political process stipulated by the two systems and the Basic Law, or abandon the opportunity to become a representative of public opinion in order to adhere to their own position.
Hong Kong 01 has many times that if Hong Kong wants to get out of the current dilemma, we must first have a correct understanding of Hong Kong's social problems and political reality, otherwise it will only continue.The so -called correct understanding means that all walks of life must understand that Hong Kong must promote reforms and bring fairness and justice to our homes.Hong Kong independence was originally mirror flowers and water, not only to miss the challenges facing Hong Kong from all walks of life, but even seriously hindered the reform of reform. However, there were still people who used this absurd illusion as one thing.Now that the district council election is approaching, we are happy to see political figures such as Zhu Kaidi returning to the right path. Within the framework of one country, two systems, we will make suggestions for the future of Hong Kong.
Homeson that the mainland is unrealistic and the ghost is looming
As early as 2014, the Hong Kong independence trend has emerged. The Hong Kong city -state theory published in 2011 is a sign. Many young people's imagination of Hong Kong independence can also be traced here., Resulting in this trend of thought continuously.At the beginning of 2015, when the then Chief Executive Liang Zhenying was in the Legislative Council to read the policy report, he even criticized the Hong Kong ethnic theory and politics in the Hong Kong University of the University of the University of Hong Kong.The purpose of his at that time was to curb such a wave of thoughts. The starting point was correct, but the effect was counterproductive, which made this illusion more concerned.It is worth mentioning that Liang Tianqi, who was imprisoned for participating in the riots of Mong Kok in 2016, once acknowledged that he had read the Hong Kong city -state theory in middle school and became a native.
Hong Kong independence problems cannot be pulled away from the veins. It is necessary to put it on the background of some Hong Kong Avil in the Mainland (mainland).In recent years, Hong Kong (Hong Kong) has a deep -seated structure contradiction and distortions of the vested interest structure. However, many young people have no accurate understanding of the cause of the problem, and even misled by some pseudo -academic theories.The source of the bureau thought that as long as the two places in Lugang were broken, Hong Kong could be relieved.
Of course, Hong Kong independence trends are not straightforward development, but have fluctuated. Referring to the polls of the Chinese University of Hong Kong's Communication and polls, it is not difficult to see the changes in it.According to the 2017 survey, the respondents who supported Hong Kong independence fell six percentage points to 11.4%from the previous year, and the opponents increased by 2.6 percentage points to 60.2%; if they were divided by age, there were 21.9 ages from 25 to 39 years old.%Supports Hong Kong independence, the highest among the groups, but it fell 1.9 percentage points from the previous year, while the 15 to 24 years old had 14.8%, which was more than 40%of the support from nearly 40%in 2016.Hong Kong's independence has lost the market, which may originate from Hong Kong and Youth's independence on Hong Kong. It is understood that this is simply a dead end.
Unfortunately, in the recent anti -repair campaign, the Hong Kong independent ghost emerged again, and replaced the anti -repair itself looming, which gradually became the main demand of the fighting movement.Hong Kong's political system.
Nation's self -determination is not applicable to Hong Kong independence nor non -rights
The nomination period of this district council is just an anti -repair campaign. Many pan -people candidates shouted to restore Hong Kong.EssenceIn the end, Zhang Xiuxian, Cen Aohui, Zhu Kaidi and others successfully released their release, reflecting that the Hong Kong government actually had a certain elasticity when deciding whether the candidate was qualified.However, this does not mean that the government (referred to as the Hong Kong government) does not have the bottom line MDash; two times from the electoral director to Zhu Kaidi, asking the other party to clarify whether it has abandoned Hong Kong independence as an option for Hong Kong people's self -determination futures, which can reflect this.
Many people look at the righteousness and think that self -determination is equivalent to determining their own affairs, but the fact is not so simple.Self-determination is the formal translation of the United Nations Self-Determination, which mainly refers to national self-determination.It originated from the 14th principles of peace in Paris and the Association of Paris after the First World War. Among them, national self -determination was the guiding principle of dealing with post -war territory issues.Internationally, self -determination is usually used in countries or regions with non -independent sovereignty such as colonial and non -autonomous territories. For example, the decision passed by the UN General Assembly in 1960 gave the colonial country and the people's declaration of independence that all people have the right to self -determination.
However, it is worth mentioning that after the People's Republic of China became a member of the United Nations in 1971, they immediately strived to abolish Hong Kong's colonial status and eventually obtained the United Nations confirmation.In other words, the central government has long known the legal meaning of self -determination. From the beginning, it realized the political risks of this trend. Before some smart people in Hong Kong had such imagination, it clarified that Hong Kong had no right to fight for independence.
In all fairness, the practice since the return of one country, two systems has not been completely smooth. In the process, there are many setbacks. Some people want to rest on the concept of self -determination, which may be understood.Take the Kitan Party commonly known as the large -scale party as an example. It has officially proposed the concept of promising self -determination in recent years of documents. It was just let go after discovering the political risks of this method.The problem is that the Citizen Party, who is familiar with the law, does not know that self -determination is the keywords for nationality to fight for independence. They have a specific context and meaning. How can other politicians know that they cannot be cited randomly?
Anyone who is rational understands that Hong Kong independence is not the theoretical issue, but the issue of political reality.It is naive and wasting for the options of Hong Kong independence as the future of Hong Kong's self -determination.The most basic approach is to not mention Hong Kong independence and abandon the sensitive word of self -determination.Only in this way can we return to one country, two systems, Hong Kong people's governance of Hong Kong, and high -degree autonomy.
When Hong Kong was in political turmoil, the Catalonia of Spain caused a large -scale demonstration due to a number of independent leaders who promoted the independent referendum in 2017.Two years ago, Gatai promoted the referendum to make the resolution ripple in Hong Kong. However, the referendum was unknown from the beginning.To allow local forces to turn autonomy into self -determination in the name of democracy; the United States and the EU flag bearers do not support the independence of independence. It also shows that when the separation movement has infiltrated political disputes, democracy is not a solution to the problem.
Compared with Catalonia and Hong Kong, it is worth thinking about how to pragmatically and rationally treat the significance and restrictions of regional autonomy and red lines, and election democracy.Regardless of the Spanish central government and the Gataionian autonomous government, they are elected for democratic elections.Thai's own democracy cannot resolve its political contradictions with the central government, and when the Gatai Autonomous Government tries to surpass the power given by the Spanish Constitution, it is only a harsh legal sanctions.
Enter the right to enter the system to compete for the right to speak at a down -to -earth
From Gatai, we can see the gap between autonomy and self -determination, so as to recognize how Hong Kong independence is unrealistic.If Zhu KaidiBecause of insisting on self -determination, he cannot enter the gate in the district council, and naturally cannot play the next year's Legislative Council election.Now that he has compromised based on realistic considerations, and has turned a big bend. The lessons in it are not deep MDASH; the Hong Kong independence claim from the secret of the politicians must bear the cost of being DQ.I would like to ask, who would believe that the Chinese government with the sovereignty of Hong Kong would allow someone to challenge the principle of one country?Who will believe that the Hong Kong Government of the Hong Kong National Party has already been banned, and people who are allowed to challenge national sovereignty will participate in a election in a system?
Affected by the anti -repair campaign, the competition for the election of the district council is extremely fierce, not only the number of applicants has always been the largest, but also the first time that no one has been automatically elected since the return.We believe that competition is so fierce that politicians hope to use the district council platform to strive for greater power in the system.Hong Kong's politicians should ask themselves, what exactly is the starting point for the election?If they change the society, they should seize this opportunity, play a beautiful election campaign, and try their best to fight for the most seats. If the brakes are successful, they will take out the real work to do a good job of district administration and prove that they have the ability to participate in Hong Kong's reform.
Before becoming the last Legislative Council election voting king, Zhu Kaidi actively participated in the opposition to the demolition of the Dingxing Wharf, Queen's Wharf, and Protecting Caiyuan Village. We must not doubt his persistence and pursuit of fairness and justice.However, Hong Kong society must clearly realize that in terms of maintaining national security and territorial integrity, the Chinese authorities cannot have no bottom line, and those who advocate self -determination and Hong Kong independence may not have enough strength to challenge this bottom line.In view of this, instead of the illusion entangled in the ground, why not return to the reality of one country, two systems, continue to fight for fairness and justice for the citizens, and take the road to Hong Kong!
