On the eve of the new round of high -level economic and trade consultations between China and the United States, the US Department of Commerce announced on the 8th of Beijing time that 28 Chinese institutions and enterprises were included in the entity list, because they were suspected of suppressing Muslims in Xinjiang.In addition, the White House trading consultant Navarro once again stated that trade negotiations must resolve the so -called seven crimes of China, including infringing intellectual property rights and mandatory technology transfer.The United States also issued an optimistic estimate of a new round of consultation between China and the United States that may achieve additional progress. The contradiction information is numerous. All this makes the atmosphere before the consultation between the two countries become more and more confusing.
The United States is preparing for the new round of consultations in China and the United States in the way of China and the United States, and mixes the limit and release of optimistic information.The density of the United States' density before the negotiation often corresponds to its actual importance of the negotiations. This game of the United States should be said to be very old -fashioned, and China is quite familiar.
How big the United States has made, China has seen it. If Washington wants to play another card, it is completely unrealistic to produce the psychological effects that exceed the previous cards.Sino -US -New negotiations cannot rely on use to achieve breakthroughs. It must be a honest negotiations to solve difficult problems.
After more than a year and a half, China and the United States have already knew each other. No matter how much bargaining the United States has added to the trade war, it has been in the strategic expectations of China, and we have prepared sufficient tolerance for the worse situation.China hopes to reach an agreement, but does not formulate an urgent timetable for ourselves. We believe that creampie can only be inferior. This is the stable strategy for China to deal with the trade war.
At present, regardless of Chinese and American society, it is expected that the two countries can reach an agreement quickly.The reason is that there are obviously many trade differences between the two countries. The attitude of the United States is not sincere, which makes the overall front front of the two sides get longer and longer, and the strategic mutual distrust is still increasing.In order to reach an agreement, the governments of the Chinese and American governments need to truly come up with political determination and make major efforts.
The United States has always emphasized its strength advantage, but the problem is that its actual advantage does not support its asking price to China, and Washington seems to have never understood this.The trade war lasted so long. If it says it has any positive significance, it should help both parties understand the relationship between their requirements and reality.We hope that in the past 20 months, it is enough to complete this clarification, and the people of the two countries will not need to pay an additional price for this.
An article on the 7th of the New York Times pointed out several major misjudgments of the United States for the trade war, including China will not take countermeasures. Trade competitions have prompted the return of the United States in the US manufacturing industry. The trade war is a beneficial war that can be easily won.It will be one of the biggest beneficiaries of the trade war. The US trade deficit will be eliminated due to the trade war.That article is very objective, but it writes less the biggest misjudgment of the United States, that is, it is believed that China is already on the edge of the collapse of will. As long as you add a little more pressure and add a wave of tariffs, China may be in the next one in the next one.In second compromise.
The Chinese delegation went to Washington with sincerity to conduct a new round of consultations. This sincerity has experienced the refinement of the discussion, which has become more mature.China and the United States need an agreement, which is the true call between the two countries and the entire international community.The reaching agreement must be a substantial improvement than the continuation of the trade war. This is the bottom line.The agreement cannot be a new coercion for a certain party.
The actions that the United States did before the negotiation had nothing to do with the substantial content of both parties negotiated, and they only tested the fragile nerves.The actual impact of 28 Chinese entities into the sanctions list will also be very limited. This attack will not disperse the attention and will of China on negotiations.
The two major economies of China and the United States are shaping the forefront of international relations in the 21st century, and the two sides can only explore the relationship model that can be accepted.What is fair and reasonable to trade needs to be defined in the running -in.These concepts itself contain bilateral and multilateral factors, not unilaterally.We hope that the process of talking about the past can eventually contribute some of the largest conventions, instead of digging the differences between China and the United States. Source: Global Times
