Source: United Daily
The break from the South Australian Bridge is just a week.Under the rapid processing of the Tsai government, this incident urgently mobilized the army to help clean up the channel, hired private companies to accelerate the demolition of the broken bridge, and the promises from the preferential care and rebuilding three years later.However, only one empty oil tank truck was broken through the bridge, and the government's administration and responsibilities were unknown and the six lives were sent to it.
In short, the Cai government once again staged the first -class kung fu of crisis treatment and pretending to be peaceful; but behind the efficient crisis treatment, it was only intended to cover up the embarrassment of governing leaks everywhere.What is even more shocking is that, as the central and local, green camps and blue camps are still pushing each other, soon on the Internet, it was reported that the academic circles on the other side were on the two analysis and judgment of my broken bridge incident, pointing out where the crux was.These two analysis are made by the Professor of Bridge of Zhejiang University of Technology and the teachers and students of the Steel Structure Center of Chongqing University.The order of order, including how to affected the broken bridge.
The reason why these two reports are amazing is that the initiative and professional dedication of mainland Chinese scholars are rare in the Taiwan academic community in recent years. The second is to directly explore the source of the problem from the broken bridge incident.Long -term experience.Taiwan, known as democracy, and self -proclaimed political parties, has been surrounded by political operations for many years, surrounding the facts of competing for power, pushing the responsibilities, and hypocrisy.The cause and effect of the broken bridge by scholars in mainland China have indeed made Taiwan ashamed, which is the part of Taiwan's democracy and politics for many years.
Leaving aside the research and judgment of Chinese scholars in mainland China, we tapped the history of the South Australian Bridge from the construction, maintenance, and broken history of the South Australian Bridge. In fact, we can find doubts everywhere.However, for many years, all the power and responsibilities, unknown division of labor, discharge of management, and opening their eyes and only continued to operate in the eyes.Can such a bridge happen?
The doubts discovered by all walks of life for review of the South Australian Bridge Bridge include: First, the South Australian Bridge operated and managed by the Keelung Port Authority, cost two.500 million yuan was actually planned, issued, supervised and built on behalf of the Yilan County Government Agricultural Bureau.How can a local agricultural bureau do these things?
Secondly, the Keelung Port Authority transformed into a Hong Kong port company seven years ago, but whether it is the Hong Kong Affairs Bureau or the Hong Kong Affairs Company, it should be responsible for the maintenance and maintenance of the bridge structure and safety in accordance with regulations.Never done it.It can be seen that the corporateization of the administrative organs is purely superficial effort, facilitating officials' responsibility, and the management function is seriously lost.
Third, as soon as the broken bridge accident occurred, the Green Camp would bombard the artillery mouth to the natalist county magistrate Lin Zimiao; in fact, this bridge was packed in the former county magistrate You Xizheng and opened in Liu Shoucheng.Party membership.Including the previous county chief, the Tsai government changed three people because of her selfishness. Among them, Wu Zecheng was currently chairman of the engineering club. He also had to report the case. Is there a problem with the character conflict?
Fourth, Liyong Building Company, which Chengqiao created this bridge, was established one year before the bidding of the bridge. Shortly after the bridge was established, the company closed down. Is there no doubt about the private phase?
Fifth, the Yilan County Government has twice commissioned the Professor of the University of Science and Technology of the University of Science and Technology to test the bridge. However, according to the report of the legislator Huang Guochang, the team will transfer the test case at a low price and did not test it without actually.The broken steel cables this time are good.It can be seen that the continuous transfer and falsification have severely corroded the public safety of Taiwan.
Sixth, the Hong Kong Affairs Company is called 49.Li Hongjun, a legislator with two metric tons, pointed out that this is much more than the standard of 42 metric tons in general bridges, which is unreasonable.
Seventh, President Tsai Ing -wen claimed the first time that the broken bridge was caused by the fire of the oil tank vehicle.In fact, the oil tank was still an empty car at the time, and it was only a fire when it fell; the president's conversation was misleading.
It is not difficult to see how the Tsai government is anxious to transfer the focus of the bridge incident because it is because the DPP from local to the central government, from the past to the present, and it is difficult to get rid of the responsibilities, neglect, Tuli, and carelessness.Fans are first -class, executive and responsibility, and no one cares about the truth of the broken bridge from the Cai government. It is clear at a glance.
