Qiu Liben (on the stage, left) of Asian Weekly editor -in -chief was held yesterday's lecture at the Singapore Hall, attracting about 800 people to attend.The chairman of the lecture is Han Yonghong, deputy editor -in -chief of Lianhe Zaobao and editor -in -chief of Morning Post (China).(Photo by Liang Weikang)
Qiu Liben believes that the Chinese and Western models will not be opposed forever, which is exactly complementary.At this point, Singapore observes Chinese society more than the location of the onlookers and plays more important roles.He takes the Xi Jockey Club and the International Chinese Junior Debate Tournament as an example. He believes that Singapore can exert more strength in the scope of cultural China and the folk China.
The internal tear of Hong Kong society today reflects the collision of Chinese models and Western models.The Chinese and Western models are not static competition but constantly developing. The two will not always be opposed and should be complementary. Singapore may play a more important role in the balance of the Chinese and Western systems and cultural fields.
Asian Weekly editor -in -chief Qiu Liben delivered a speech in the Singapore Hall yesterday afternoon in the Singapore Hall based on the latest challenges of the global Chinese society in 2019. In a speech for more than 70 minutes, he analyzed the current perspective of a Hong Kong media and a native of Hong Kong people.The cause of social turmoil in Hong Kong.
State development lies in good rule
Qiu Liben believes that most of the demonstrations represented by Huang Si are mostly the value of free and democratic democracy in the West. This value continues to ferment and expand under the demands of localization, and has evolved into an independent longing.On the contrary, Lan Si cannot recognize the theory of independence.He said that from the perspective of a larger historical framework, the tear of the two is actually a collision between China's development model and the Western model.
Qiu Liben said that traditionally, the CCP was criticized for one -party dictatorship, but in the past ten years, the CCP relied on openness, innovation, and internal checks and balances, which caused the country to change the world.At the same time, the democratic model of the West and one vote has also been reflected by more and more scholars. They realized that without good supporting and economic development, even one person and one vote will become a failed country.Therefore, the ideal country's development is not to vote, but the government's ability, that is, good governance, which seems to be the direction of China's development.
Qiu Liben believes that there are three main reasons for the great changes in mainland China.The first is to fully invest in the globalization system to maintain the opening up of society and economy. At the same time, strong public power participates in the operation of the market economy. Using the advantages of state -owned enterprises to make China the world's largest high -speed rail system, highway networks, etc.China also extended these infrastructure technologies to other countries such as Southeast Asia, Africa.
Secondly, the development of the global Internet has led to the development of Chinese private enterprises. Internet technology giants led by Huawei, Alibaba, and Tencent, allowing China to have a unique and creative consumer model, and also created many employment opportunities and become innovation.The country with the highest consciousness.In addition, since taking office, it has been effectively monitored and checks and balanced the entire bureaucratic system since taking office.
Qiu Liben said that the Chinese and Western models are not static competitions, but are constantly developing. The Western system has its rationality, but it cannot be simply copied.The question, but in the process of rapid economic development and comprehensive innovation, it also proposes new possibilities. These two models will not be opposed forever, which is exactly complementary.
Qiu Liben said that at this point, Singapore, as an independent country, observes Chinese society more than the location of the onlookers and plays a more important role.As an example, the then President Ma Ying -jeou) and the international Chinese junior debate are examples, and Singapore believes that Singapore can exert more strength in the scope of cultural China and the folk China.
Qiu Liben then emphasized again when he talked with the deputy editor -in -chief of Lianhe Zaobao and the editor -in -chief of the Morning Post (China) Han Yonghong again that the role played by Singapore was removed from ideology.On the top, you can play more creative characters.In the last hour of the Q & A session, the audience asked enthusiastically. Many people expressed high concern on the trend of the Hong Kong situation and the Sino -US trade war, and the atmosphere was active.When Qiu Liben ended, although the Hong Kong economy was inevitable affected by anti -repair cases, as an irreparable optimist, he believed that the Hong Kong storm might force China's self -reflection and reform and transformed negative energy into positiveenergy.
The lecture was jointly organized by Lianhe Zaobao and Xinyue Social Sciences University, attracting about 800 people to attend.
