Macrons ＂single -out＂ 600 mayor dialogue for seven hours ＂Zheng?

Written article: Lin Jian

The anti -repair storm swept the whole Hong Kong for more than 3 months. Chief Executive Lin Zheng Yue'e proposed a dialogue platform earlier.As a head gun, she met with a number of officials with a number of officials the day before (18th).In fact, since the development of exercise, the five major demands of the people have been clear. I believe that Lin Zheng cannot hear it. The problem is only acceptable or not.Therefore, some people may think that the so -called dialogue has a strong taste of politics.

However, even if it is political show, it always needs to do well.With reference to the French yellow vest movement that is often used in Hong Kong's recent demonstration, President Macron will hold a two -month -old national debate from January this year.Long dialogue.Its posture and degree of opening up are quite worthy of the reference of the Hong Kong government. Even if it may not be able to flutter the fire immediately, at least the government shows that the government has the heart dialogue and helps to cool down.

1. Lin Zheng 2 hours vs Macron 7 hours

Based on realistic restrictions, it is impossible for everyone to speak, but the longer the time is, at least there are more space to make the participants speak freely.There are currently 458 district councilors in Hong Kong. Lin Zhengqi invited all district councilors to attend, but the meeting time was only 2 hours, that is, the average person was only 15.7 seconds per person.It is understood that 98 district councilors were eventually attended, 38 people were arranged to speak, and each person's speaking time limit was 3 minutes.Under time, Lin Zheng finally spoke once in each game and ended. A few minutes each time, it was inevitable that he felt that he had a dialogue to his throat to the lungs.

In contrast, after the French yellow vest movement broke out at the end of last year, Macron started a dialogue on January 15th to the northwest town Grand Bourgtheroulde, and he met about 600 mayor in a single horse.It is also a regional person, and Macron spent 7 hours to talk to many mayor.Macron copied his notes in the process, and stood up every time he stood up to respond to the issues that received attention one by one.

2. Traditional debate vs traditional civil servant -based consultation meeting

In France, this type of debate has its tradition itself.In the 17th and 18th centuries of the Enlightenment period, salon culture, encouraged citizens to debate, exchange, discuss social affairs, public policies, etc. from the government to grass -roots farmers, and they can participate in debate and cultivate citizen awareness (at least on the surface), at least), at least on the surface), at least), at least), at least), at least on the surface), at least), at least), at least), at least), at least), at least), at least), at least), at least), at least), at least), at least), at least), at least), at least), at least).It also gave birth to a famous philosopher such as Rousseau, Voltaire.The people are arguing that the people's debate is relatively relative to the people, and believes that at least it is a more effective way to absorb public opinion.

In addition to the single -person debate, Macron also subsequently participated in other forms of discussions, such as going to the city council to receive inquiries and private lunch meetings, etc., which are quite diversified.

However, in Hong Kong, officials have attracted private opinions on policies, which are mainly limited to official forms of consultation and public hearing.Civil servants responded to the strong opinions of the public. Generally, they were extremely official and human cosmetic recorder, which have long been criticized by the outside world.So curious is whether the future dialogue can be separated from this shadow.

When Lin Zheng summed up his speech a few days ago, it was only the most important principles of maintaining the prosperity and stability of Hong Kong's prosperity and stability. The rule of law is the most important core value of Hong Kong, and it will continue to communicate with the citizens.If you continue to use this standard answer to this standard, according to the official response of this announcement, will the public receive the goods, is it calm or more angry?

3. Execute Members into the venue vs to the town

Choosing the place of meeting is also a knowledge.To see people in the region, the lord's accompanying is naturally more kind.After Macron took office, it was exactly that the outside world was proud, elite, and unknown people's suffering, and was similar to Lin Zhengyue today.

The meeting place selected by Macron is large, Butrum, with a population of only more than 3,000 people.In the future debate, Macron also repeatedly opposed the base of the camp and dialogue with regional people.In terms of perception, at least one sincerity is displayed.

As for Lin Zheng, he was settled in the government headquarters and asked the district councilors to come to pilgrimage.The government also used tourist buses to pick up district councilors instead of letting them go. Saigon District Councilor Fang Guoshan described this form to be unreasonable, and the external view has been lost.Of course, Lin Zheng's conversation was just the beginning. In the future, would she go deep into the base of some democratic schools and talk generously with citizens with different opinions?Everyone wait and see.

4. What is the live broadcast?

Lin Zheng's dialogue earlier, recording, videos and live broadcasts were prohibited in the field beforehand.At least two district councilors tried to raid live on Facebook at that time, but they were quickly discovered and prevented.The entire dialogue process is not public, and it is difficult for the public to know what the actual talk is.

In contrast, Macron's dialogue with the mayor was broadcast publicly on the day.The public can still revisit the complete process in the YouTube channel in the Elyde Palace.

Of course, when Lin Zheng met the business people, he repeatedly had recording flowing out, and the golden sentence exploded. He also said that he would resign if he had a choice.More mistakes, or deliberately selectively release part of the recording, that is another problem.

Is it positive response appeal or continue noted with thanks?

Therefore, in the current information age, the government must understand the way of people's conditions. The so -called dialogue can be said to be a political show.However, temporary actors are also actors. At least they should be done well. In terms of observation, the public feels sincerity, and she is helpful to the situation.Just as a dialogue, there is too much room for improvement in Lin Zheng and the district members.

In particular, the current folk, middle school, and gentle system have strong voices that the supervisor's system has insufficient power. It requires the establishment of an independent investigation committee to clarify the truth. Officials must hear clearly, but they play Tai Chi with the same pile of official cavity.If Lin Zheng's team continues to be accepted by this opinion, but the style of style is still the same, the so -called dialogue is afraid that it will become different from the substantial meaning.The first community consultation will be held next Thursday (26th), and it depends on what tricks the government will come up.