Hot topic

The ancients said that if you do not review the trend, you can go to the opposite side if you are lenient and strict.Reflexive examples have been extended to the present, and the Hong Kong society has been emphasized. I wonder if the master has felt here?

Looking back at the beginning of the storm, Chief Executive Lin Zhengyue and supporters of the crew faced public opinion and strongly promoted the practice, and finally became a chaos. This is undoubtedly a serious political misjudgment.Although the Chief Executive has repeatedly reviewed and apologized, it has been difficult to escape arrogance, handling, and self -use.The parade is getting stronger, the violence is almost out of control, and the chief executive has once lived in a brief.

Until mid -August, after the incident of the airport, all sectors of Hong Kong were anti -violence, making the brave martial arts a little frustrated.At this time, he should have taken advantage of the punch, and promoted the cutting of Hefei and Yongwu, solved the problem of violence in one fell swoop, and returned the demonstration to the rule of law.Unfortunately, the Hong Kong Government hopes that violence has subsided on its own and is committed to building a dialogue platform. The police force has been linked to all kinds of restrictions.

The opposition did not buy it. He scolded the dialogue as a public relations, and he wanted to press the Hong Kong Government to accept five demands.In late August, violent behavior came over and became more aggressive.The appeasement of the Hong Kong Government made violent members more and more brave.

After the airport incident, the Internet was hot, Li Guangyao used 65 minutes to calm down the overall allusions of the New Airlines pilot strike, respecting the discipline of its establishment, and then the principle of disposal of negotiations to satirize the weakness of the Hong Kong government.Although these two things are different, the situation is different, and it is not suitable for simple analogy, but the Hong Kong and Police Force's disposal of violence incidents indeed lose it wide and soft.

The police's restraint is a high -quality manifestation, and it is also due to the pressure of public opinion.In fact, Hong Kong ’s social anti -violence, many people are opposed to the abuse of power abuse by the police who have been discredited by the media. Instead, they believe that the violence of the brave school is harmless and even illegally.Generally, the people also seem to feel that young people are just their father -in -law and do not need to punish severe punishment.This kind of acquiescence and long vertical mentality made the police team's hands and feet.At this time, Zhengxu's Hong Kong Government seized the opportunity to make political decisions to stop violence for the police.

The Hong Kong Government was so strong that the repair was so strong, and it was like a soft -footed crab facing violence in the back.As a result, the problem of violence is not solved, and Li Fei and Yongwu factions have never cut off the seats and are not ashamed. With the thoughts of brothers climbing and working hard, they echo secretly.

In this scenario, the dialogue may not be able to get rid of the brave and martial arts holdings, and the attitude will be very tough. It is difficult to accept the concessions of the Hong Kong government and make necessary compromises.Any concession in the Hong Kong Government will also be regarded as weakness under violence deterrence, rather than sincerity.This is easy to fall into a deadlock, turning into a dead end of mutual distrust and uncompromising, and slowly consumes the good expectations of the Hong Kong and the central government and the Mainland.

It should be noted that not only the oppositions want to get fried, but the eagle factions in the Mainland may not be unhappy with Li Fei and Yongwu school, so that the conversation is delayed and the violence continues to upgrade to seize the opportunity and kill a hammer.

Take a step back, even if the dialogue achieves results, it will leave a bad precedent MDASH; mdash; mdash; make the public feel that it is feasible to resort to violence, even more useful than peaceful demonstration.As soon as this example is opened, there is no later.

In view of the rebound and upgrade of violence, the Chief Executive stated that at the end of August, it was responsible for using the rule of law to stop violence as soon as possible, and reiterated that the independent investigation committee did not agree with the establishment of an independent investigation committee.Obviously, the conversation will not go smoothly.However, in the cracking down on violence, the Hong Kong Government and the police should no longer look forward to it, fear of the first, and do not worry about strong means to arouse social opposition or destroy the atmosphere of the dialogue.Because the situation in Hong Kong cannot afford long -term delay, since the dialogue is opened, active progress must be made as soon as possible to avoid being trapped into the quagmire and letting all parties lose expectations.

At this time, only if you are perseverance and ban on violence by the thunderbolt, can you promote the clearing limit of the Hefei and Yongwu factions, so that the dialogue will not be disturbed by radicals.The strong forbidden violence, and listening to the public opinion is by no means confrontation.On the contrary, both are the performance of Hong Kong's dare to take responsibility and responsibility in the future, and will eventually win social understanding and support.

The ancients said that it was only expensive to change the power.Hong Kong has faced the most severe situation since the return.In this way, it can be regarded as not refuge, and the aspirations are not easy, so it is considered to be responsible for the future of Hong Kong.

The author is a legal adviser to China Jilin Provincial Cultural Communication Company