Source: Taiwan Industry and Commerce Times
The United States, Germany, and the British who are replacing Prime Minister have launched the campaign of the president and the Prime Minister's election. At present, the mainstream public opinion still believes that the unified independence issue and the US and China opposition is the main axis of the Taiwan presidential election in 2020. However, if it is from TaiwanFrom the perspective of the phenomenon of South Korea ’s Yu, the United States Democratic candidates, the Brexit’ s public opinion, and the rapid decline of the Merkel regime in Germany, the left and right duel may have quietly occupied the commanding heights of global politics.
The left and right duels are relatively complicated in political theory, but in the field of economic policy, the economic left and right have relatively simple wild divisions.At the economic level, South Korea ’s Yu obviously obtained the support of the people at the bottom. Compared with Guo Taiming from the capitalist of the chairman of the multinational enterprise, although both of them shouted a fortune, the economic discussion was very different. In the end, the line from South Korea’ s citizen won greatly.See the tendency of the people.
The newspaper should be carefully handled by the basic salary, minimum salary, and salary increases of civil servants before the corporate election yesterday's community election. It is also a classic case of economic policy confrontation.President Tsai Ing -wen has been in office since 2016, and has raised the basic salary and minimum hourly salary of labor for three consecutive times. The government intervention in the basic salary of the enterprise is to directly allocate the interests of shareholders to the grassroots employees.After that, the cost of the company's increase was increased by 10.777 billion yuan in 2017, 10.861 billion yuan in 2018, and increased to 14.261 billion yuan in 2019. It has increased by nearly 36 billion yuan in three years.The amount of salary increase and connection effect is extremely considerable.
During the office of former President Park Geun -hye, South Korea enthusiastically embraced the left -like policy of raising the statutory minimum salary to raise the salary of labor. South Korea has pulled the basic salary in the past four years, with a cumulative increase of 52%. In contrast, the Cai Yingwen government for three years for three yearsThe cumulative amplitude is 15.4%. If it continues to increase by 5%this year, the cumulative amplitude of four years will be more than 20%. The amplitude is milder than South Korea.
However, the policies of South Korea ’s basic salary have caused violent side effects. South Korea’ s unemployment rate rose to 3.8%last year, the highest level in 17 years, and wrote a record of millions of unemployed army for three consecutive years.As a result, the government's heavy financial burden, the South Korean government paid a total of 1.39 million unemployment benefits in 2018, with a amount of 6.6 trillion won, which is about NT $ 180 billion, bringing new burdens to the government's financial government finance.
Wen Zaiyin and Tsai Ing -wen have no close contacts, but they also adopt the left -leaning labor policy at the same time. This is not a unique phenomenon of Asian countries.The big result, reducing the gap between the rich and the poor is a challenge that governments must face. The simplest and most political correct solution is to directly force the employees to increase salary and benefits on the issues of the employees and the labor.subsidy.
Interestingly, the continuous expansion of the global economy has promoted the waves of leftist economic policies.The National Economic Research Agency (NBER) recently released a Research Report on Landscape Research. The economic expansion of the United States has set a historical record of 121 consecutive months in July.The expansion of scientific and technological innovation before the millennium was twice the average period of economic recovery after the war.If the Federal Federation starts the interest rate reduction policy at the end of this month and continues to carry out preventive and loose monetary policies, it is more likely that the perfect model of low inflation, high employment, and mild economic growth can be extended indefinitely.
In this environment, the U.S. economic leftist sound waves have risen rapidly, and the Democratic Party's presidential candidate has continuously put forward the policy propositions of various economic leftist.Two headquarters; the Raise The Wage Act proposed by the two houses of the House of Representatives (Raise The Wage Act), which should increase the current basic hourly salary of $ 7.25 per hour to $ 15 by 2025;It proposes a free allowance of $ 1,000 per person per month; Massachusetts Senator Huarlen, who shows the volume of victory, is forced to split the technology giants such as Google, Facebook, and Amazon as the main axis of the campaign.
Economic expansion and tax growth, accompanied by the phenomenon of the gap between the rich and the poor, allowing the economic leftist to believe that the government can significantly increase subsidies, allowances, and tax increases.Theory) has become the theoretical basis for Democratic members of the Democratic Party to pursue the leftist economic policy.
The Merkel regime in Germany can be said to be a representative of classical rights policies. Free trade, breaking tariff barriers, adhering to fiscal discipline, and avoiding the use of excessive loose monetary policy to stimulate the economy, but the Merkel regime has even been in China after 15 years.The teams are crumbling, facing the choice that must be tilted with the left -handed Green Party policy.
The U.S. presidential election seems to have a high probability of re -election in Trump, but Trump's last campaign is the main axis. The tone of rural and urban duel has quietly shifted.He also eroded Trump's ticket warehouse with the left economic policy. Trump's recent attack on the Democratic Party has become more and more prosperous. He obviously has realized that the rise of economic leftists may affect his reelection.
It is certain that under the push -pull effect of the continuous expansion of the economy and the gap between the rich and the poor.We will hear more leftist economic opinions, and we can only choose between the left and left candidates.
