Author: Liu Jincai

Chen Mingtong, chairman of the MAC, spoke in Washington. He criticized the mainland authorities to domesticize Taiwan in the principle of Naruto No. 1 Central China, and called on the mainland authorities to abandon the political framework of Taiwan, two systems and two systems designed by unilaterally designed to restore cross -strait communication dialogue to reduce the risk of misjudgment.At the same time, Chen Ming Taiwan is a sovereign country. Taiwan, Taiwan, is never part of the People's Republic of China. It is believed that it is Taiwan's consensus that it is not acceptable to accept one country and two systems.Speaking of this, it is politically declared that it does not help restore the benign interaction between cross -strait.

First of all, call on the mainland to abandon the framework of the two systems and two systems, trying to raise Cai Yingwen's continuous downturn support.Recently, the master of Taiwan independence theoretical master Lin Zhuoshui pointed out that the President of the Democratic Progressive Party was average of five polls.However, in early July, the support of polls in early July, whether it was a blue -green showdown or a three -legged governor, lost all the battle, and greatly lagged behind Guo Taiming and South Korea ’s Yu, showing that it did not produce catfish effects due to the competition of Lai Qingde.

At the beginning of the year ... Published five o'clock and proposed the two systems of Taiwan, Cai also proposed countermeasures, claiming that he had never accepted the 1992 consensus. He believed that the 1992 consensus was one country, two systems, and Taiwan consensus was opposed to one country and two systems.The primary process coincides with the outbreak of Hong Kong to reflect on the CUHK parade, oppose one country, two systems, and become a life -saving fairy Dan, who has supported the support of public opinion.From the Democratic Progressive Party's opposition to one country, two systems, and chairman Chen asked the mainland authorities to abandon one country, two systems, and their election strategy considerations, trying to use the opposition to one country, two systems to play a marginal effect of Cai's support.

Secondly, the DPP's tools are the role of the Republic of China, and the Republic of China is not equal to Taiwan.Positioning between the two sides of the Strait Relations Regulations is one country and two districts, and different systems are implemented separately.Therefore, one country is the Republic of China, and the two districts are Taiwan and the mainland. The two systems are the system of capitalism and socialist political and economic agencies. The accurate statement of the two sides of the strait should be the two systems, two districts, two regions and two systems.During the period of the Kuomintang's administration, the national unified program emphasized the three stages of cross -strait countries and the establishment of cross -strait exchanges, and grasped the initiative of the Cross -Strait Integration A agenda.

Although both the country and the people are opposed to the one -country and two systems of the land version, the Kuomintang is still a unified party.The DPP claims to identify with the Republic of China, but because it does not recognize the 1992 consensus, it is generally believed that the DPP will be temporarily used for Taiwan's Taiwanization and backdoor.The Republic of China does not equal to Taiwan. Taiwan and the Republic of China are different concepts of sovereign independence.

Chairman Chen criticized the mainland authorities to domesticize Taiwan in the principle of one China, although it has its objective facts.However, it is declared that Taiwan is a sovereign state. Regardless of historical facts and international law, Taiwan, Taiwan, has never been a country name, and is easily interpreted as the two countries.In the past, Chen Mingtong called for the fact that the existence of the Republic of China was in the past.If the Democratic Progressive Party intends to confront one country and two systems with the theory of the two countries, cross -strait relations may be difficult to repair and fall into a vicious circle.It is not a contradiction to call on the mainland authorities to negotiate with the mainland authorities.

Cross -strait policies should not just stay against one country, two systems, or just countermeasures in specific governance issues.Under the premise of cross -strait integration, we should propose strategic thinking and policy viewpoints in Taiwan.Although the Democratic Progressive Party's countermeasures on the other side of the other country, the key is to refuse to have replacement, take the initiative to strive for the right to speak and the dominance of cross -strait policies in one country, two systems, and cross -strait policies.

(The author is assistant professor at the Department of Public Affairs of Fo Guang University)