Han Huiji
Once upon a time, the term public intellectuals (public knowledge) had been stigmatized in China.There is a paragraph on the Internet that said so:
Advanced version of male and female.For example, the public is the phoenix, the female is the phoenix;So how to distinguish spiders?Answer: Gongzhi and sow.Someone followed one after another: please don't insult the sow hellip; hellip;
However, Cui Yongyuan is also listed in public.Seeing an article on the Lianhe Zaobao Speech Edition is why Chinese public intellectuals written by Qiao Xinsheng's reputation for bankruptcy.Because of the first thought of the hardship of the fighter Cui Yongyuan, I thought I could see something fresh, but I couldn't help but be disappointed.
Qiao Wen came up to talk about moral construction, assuming the moral height of intellectuals.Although this is a bit of self -speaking and singing high -profile, it can be regarded as traditional thinking. It is understandable.However, the analysis of the reputation of Chinese public intellectuals is not unavoidable to the rough rate: it is really curious that the public knows how to improve the moral level and play a model leading role in social life.With the two contexts, where is the power of modeling?What did the people who had missed melon? For the time being, they did not talk about the basic citizenship who violated the freedom of speech, but I felt that this tone was too bizarre and retro.
There is no one person, but the author said that public intellectuals must fully aware of the historical mission they shoulder, and must have the spirit of the Grand Duke.hellip; I honestly feel that the tone is too high, just like some kind of declaration of joining the party.It cannot be said that it is not good, but unrealistic.I ca n’t talk about specific questions, and I just practice morally. This is the scolding of the two thousand years of popularity. It ’s not rare.
Some scholars analyzed in deeper.From the mouthpiece of the people to the public enemy, the public knows that the seven sins are listed: First, everyone competes as the public, and the public knows to enter the era of MLM; 2.Positions are greater than right and wrong; 5. Transformed posture; 6. Sixth, vested interests and academic hegemony; 7. Criticize the Chinese system and praise the United States.
Qiao Wen's two traffickers are similar to the seventh point of them. Except for the scolding, there is something real.
Singapore does not have the knowledge that can be compared with Chinese big V.Although there is no perfection, the huge black holes such as social conscience and human heart are not existing. They can be regarded as the political people, and there is no call, no soil, no demand.Because Minzhi has been developed, the society of rule of law is in an orderly manner. In this context, people pay attention to low -key remarks.There are also some high -profile discussions in the newspapers, either a very novel perspective or a deeper thinking.Of course, the other side of this Hehe is less waves and lively.Unlike Xiao Cui, the master who is currently the number one in China, it makes the river over the river, and public opinion can reach Baidu.
This case itself explains that: 1. As a constructive critic and unveiled person, the influence of public knowledge can be an important part of the joint force of the national reform and development; 2. The official tolerance of the official knowledge is the best example of the way to open a wide range of words.No matter how blackened prejudices are, it is useless. When people look at the government's attitude, they must be clear about their progress.The Global Times Hu Xijin said well: No public knows that it is not possible to drive the rhythm without mdash; mdash; this is fair, better than Qiao Wen.
Some new immigrants who have been in China for many years, like me, found that some of my news on China can no longer be used to it.For example, Fan Bingbing disappeared and Meng Hongwei disappeared.Friends have a long -distance call: China is very good, and the Chinese are very good. Do not be misleading by some western media.The taste of receiving this kind of phone is very special. On the one hand, I sincerely willing to believe that this is true, my relatives and friends can live a good life; on the other hand, I have been considered the actual situation of China.It is the rule of law, and the rule of man is the rule of human beings. The legal society mixed with human governance will produce hypocritical politics and anxiety of the whole people.At the stage where freedom of speech cannot be implemented, populism and public opinion that represents some public opinion is a balance.For social stability, it is still necessary to watch this historical inevitable phenomenon.At least, we should not make a one -sided scolding.
The author is a private company partner
