Since the reform is so difficult, I will not change it.

Reform is nothing more than systematically corrected.There is a paradox here: the planning system was originally because the error correction ability is not strong enough, and many problems need to be reformed.But does the banner of reform, will the error correction ability of our system become stronger?There is also a new bias in practice. It is difficult and difficult. The reform has made some progress. Therefore, some economic achievements have been achieved. There is a kind of public opinion that our system is the most light system in the world. There is no need to change it.Essence

Since the reform is so difficult, can you simply change it?I simply announced that China has built a new system. No need to reform again. Can it work?If you think about it, the answer is not.Because the change is not changed, the big trouble is behind.There are three levels.

First, do not continue to promote reform in some key areas, do not continue to promote the reform of the socialist market economy, and do not promote the improvement of socialist democracy and the legal reform of legal systems. Many social contradictions will show a trend of chain explosion.

Taking the corruption case of senior officials as an example, the number of money involved in the case is huge enough to stimulate itself.The more important thing is that it is not a huge sum of money to grab the bank, but it seems to be an by -product of "normal work Andrdquo; with power.There are huge vulnerabilities using the system.Only running corrupt officials, without changing the system, tigers and flies are endless, endless.

When it comes to the current economic situation, the general characteristics are high downward.As the old saying, Andrdquo; that is, it is easy to go downhill and it is easy to have problems when going downhill. Many contradictions are covered when they grow at high speed, but when they go downSet up the shelf to make the best top -level design, or slowly touch the stones and cross the river. Many problems have been delayed for a long time, and more problems have arisen. I wrote "Then the stone crosses the river Andrdquo;A flying over and forcing you to fight.This is the first level.

In the second level, younger people have become the main body of society. They evaluate the system, policies, and their own environment. There are new reference departments that are different from the previous generation, and they are also expected to have higher expectations for the ideal society.For example, for the great famine from 1959 to 1961 and this generation of the people's commune and cultural revolution, seeing the changes after China's reform and opening up, no matter how much they feel like they have improved.However, for the post -80s and post -90s, their reference departments are different.They live in more open China and have a more understanding of the world's situation. They believe that the world should have been like this and that. If they do not meet the standards, they will not be satisfied.

Now the main body of the social population, that is, the most active population in the industrial structure, the most active population in the consumption structure, the most active population in cultural activities, what are their references and their expected value?Are they a little higher about social justice and the ruler of modern civilization than in the past. It feels even more indispensable for the negative phenomenon brought about by the inadequate reform?To see, China's economic aggregate is the second place in the world.Because of this, people's expectations for their country are higher than in the past.We can't talk about what happened before the reform, let alone how to talk about before liberation.

A country has hope, it must be a generation of generations of expectations for their own society.Therefore, the reform is also matched with the expectations of becoming the mainstream population.If it is too slow to change, it will not be possible to follow the expectations of the younger generation of society, and there will be problems with the disappointment, and it may also make the disappointment mobilize.

In the third level, many institutional variables now change too slowly, and they are not old, and they are stimulating more and more external behaviors and external phenomena.There are many things, saying a set of laws, a set of books, and people actually do another.Many people are not in the framework of the law, but to discuss life in the world outside the Fa.

Seeing such phenomena, people are accustomed to criticizing the Chinese people who have laws and laws.This problem exists.But in some cases, it is really because of a lot of our laws that are unreasonable.I took a small example. When the civil airliner landed on the ground, I must say that everyone should not turn on the phone.But there are almost everyone on the mobile phone.However, taking the Hong Kong Cathay Pacific or Dragon flight, they broadcast the broadcast as soon as they landed and said that they can now turn on their mobile phones.

My problem is that if there is no bad consequences on opening the phone after landing, why don't you get it on your phone?This means that in some cases, it is not difficult to change the law or regulations.Now many economic controls, or regulations or policies, are difficult to implement at all.

Many cities have Andrdquo; why? Why? It is often Andrdquo; the threshold for operation is too high and the burden is too heavy.For places where white cars cannot serve, black cars often emerge.Look at the so -called Andrdquo;, there is no status in law, there is a market in reality. How much is the French property in Beijing at the foot of Tianzi? And how many Andrdquo;IntersectionA big guy, talked a few words and told you that he was fined hundreds of thousands of yuan before he came to this world.What do they think of our society?The financial reform talks about Andrdquo; the discussion is very lively. But to get closer to life, which interest rate model is not in reality? So, the French world is very lively, and there are "Chinese -style roads of Chinese -style roads Andrdquo;

Speaking of these phenomena, Andrdquo; prevailing Andrdquo; prevailing andmdash; andmdash; this will not be touched, that does not change. But it seems to forget a great truth, that is, to make most people's behavior, legal in legality in legality.Carry out in the framework. In a fast -changing society, the reform must improve the institutionalization ability, that is, to resolve external behavior, and to incorporate as much as possible to the internal framework as much as possible to others and society.More and more people start another furnace, and "Don't play Andrdquo;, that's the biggest institutional failure.

Reform was difficult.Standing at this moment, it is more difficult to change.But delaying reform is not a way out.In a realistic situation, reforms must not only run with corruption or defeat, but also the expected race of the younger social subjects, and there are activities that can withstand a large number of foreign worlds to absorb the system.In these three directions, if you do n’t win, the trouble is behind.