Early Andnbsp; Ji Yanchun Autumn
In the past two weeks, men's high -speed rail overlap, women have been raped by Didi Shunfeng, and the flower arms man Andrdquo; the three incidents of hacking people have stirred public opinion. Especially Andrdquo;The anti -killing case has become a sign in the process of Chinese rule of law.
On the evening of August 27th, a BMW car suddenly turned right to the right non -motorized lane on the streets of Kunshan City, Jiangsu.A slight scraping of the car, a male and female passenger on the BMW car discussed with a man in white, and there was no physical conflict between the two sides.
At this moment, a man with a pattern on his upper body and arms rushed out of the BMW driver's seat and pushed the white man.Then the flower arm man quickly rushed back to the car and took out a long knife to cut the man in the white man. Unexpectedly, the long knife fell to the ground.The man in white first took the long knife and stabbed the flower arms man.Flower arms fled to BMW, chasing in white man.As a result, the flower arm man lost too much blood.
The video of monitoring and passers -by records the process of the entire event clearly.Police confirmed that the man in white was Yu Heming, a man who worked in Kunshan, and the flower arm man was known as Andrdquo; Liu Hailong, "Dragon Brother Andrdquo.Management of a pawn.
This dramatic incident has aroused heated discussion in public opinion in China, and also aroused the legal discussion of "legitimate defense andrdquo; just defense andrdquo; countless netizens and legal professionals expressed their views.
Most lawyers believe that white men are facing danger of life, and picking up knife counterattacks are legitimate defense; some lawyers said that although white man is a legitimate defense, he is suspected of being too defensive.Most netizens stood firmly on the man in white, thinking that the law should declare that white men were innocent; many netizens claimed that this incident would test whether Chinese justice was fair and related to the public's confidence in judicial judicialness.
The public's concerns are not unfounded.Sohu.com Andrdquo; an analysis published by the 2017 An article published in 2017 shows that 100 copies released by the China Magistrate Book Network in 2017 with Andrdquo, which are published by the Chinese referee.In the judgment, only four were identified by the court. The other 20 were excessive defense and 76 were crime of intentional injury.
However, this anti -killing case has different results.The Kunshan Public Security Bureau announced the night before that Yu Heming's behavior was a legitimate defense, but it was not responsible for criminal responsibility, and the case was revoked.The Jiangsu Provincial Procuratorate subsequently explained why Heming was not guilty: Liu Hailong provoked the incident and faults were first; Yu Heming was facing a serious danger of serious life safety; the behavior of Heming's counterattack was a normal response, which met the special defense requirements;From the perspective of the system value of legitimate defense, the defender should be given priority.
Facing the aggressive public opinion, the police and prosecutors gave the answer six days after the incident, and the speed was not unhappy.Moreover, the official response conforms to the expectations of public opinion, reversing the awareness of the previous society's legitimate defense and the loss of losses, and is generally welcomed by official and folk public opinion. It has also become one of the few successful cases in the interaction of officials and civilians.
Just when the Kunshan anti -killing case and the driver of the driver of Didi Shunfeng on August 24, people forgot to forget the men's high -speed rail over -seat incident on August 21, and Andrdquo, Andrdquo;, Take the initiative to jump out and connect these incidents together.
On August 30th, Andrdquo; A video recorded in cooperation with the recording once again triggered a anger of the netizen. In the video, Andrdquo;He waved to the camera and shouted: And "Dragon Brother, help me push me, thank you for Di Di. ANDRDQUO;
On August 21, on the high -speed rail from Jinan to Beijing, Sun refused to seize the number, occupying the seat of a female passenger, and claimed to "stand up to stand up when the train captain persuaded.;
Andrdquo; Andrdquo; AND's behavior was criticized by netizens. On August 22, Sun filmed an apology video, saying that he regretted his behavior and asked the people of the whole country to give him a new chance. On August 24thIn terms of the railway, it is said that Sun had a fine of 200 yuan (about S $ 40) and restricted its train within a certain period of time.
But in the video on the 30th, Sun smiled and took Andrdquo; even Didi Shunfeng car raped the case, showing that his apology was not much sincere.Sun's performance shows that Chinese society still seriously lacks awareness of the rule of law and rules, and this is the pain and difficulties that hinder China's progress.
