The official relationship between the two sides of the strait has accelerated the deterioration, but the mainland does not change the policy of benefiting Taiwan. After the announcement of 31 Wet Taiwan at the beginning of the year, the people of Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan have recently opened a residence permit. Taiwanese people who have lived in the mainland for more than half a year can enjoy and the mainland can enjoy and the mainland.The people of the people are the same life welfare benefits.For a long time, the mainland has provided Andrdquo; at that time, the mainland's "quasi -foreigners' treatment andrdquo; and the mainland's standard of living was relatively low. Compared with the meaning of foreigners, the mainland policy ideas have been adjusted as" quasi -national treatment Andrdquo Andrdquo;, This reflects the confidence of the mainland for many years of development, including institutional self -confidence, as well as self -confidence in development, because the national treatment of the mainland has become more attractive, and foreigners' treatment is no longer advantage.
Behind the changes, it is reflected in the long -term progress of the mainland for nearly thirty years. In these thirty years, it has also been the 30 years of cross -strait exchanges. Taiwanese have participated in the process of development and progress in the mainland and witnessed this process.Unfortunately, when the mainland declines to prosperity, Taiwan has changed from prosperity.However, Taiwanese society has long been subject to Andrdquo; in the "anti -Chinese revenge; Andrdquo; ideological propaganda, we cannot rationally face the development and successful experience of mainland development, but blindly degrades the mainland. It has not seen the political correctness of the prosperous Chinese mainland.However, the existence of the mainland does not disappear due to the negligence of Taiwan. Especially the international influence of the mainland is long.Facing the facts of the rise of the mainland.
However, to change the string more to acknowledge the rise of the mainland, it is not easy to imagine. First of all, it is necessary to abandon the prejudice of ideology and independent fields, to review the logic of the development of the mainland with a more objective and rational attitude, and explore from the institutional level.Pursuing a strong motivation for development.
Obviously, in the Deng Xiaoping era, the mainland finally established a national policy centered on economic construction through the big debate, and used this as the guiding principle of evaluation and selection officials.More professional and more focused on development of officials.In the process, officials' complete training system will undoubtedly play a key role.The training system with the party school and the administrative college as the main body is an important reason for the great development achievements in mainland China today.
The Western -style free democracy system is facing many challenges. The American scholar Fukuyama, a American scholar that has been advertised as the end of the history of history, has reflected whether there is something wrong with the democratic system?The development experience of the mainland undoubtedly provides a reference.The mainland is a one -party dictatorship. Through the training of specialized officials, it ensures that the bureaucratic system focuses on economic development, avoids the disadvantages of party struggles common in democratic society, and disadvantages to oppose opposition.Professional training can also ensure that officials have the professional ability to promote economic development and solve various problems in governance. To maximize the fact that officials with different professional backgrounds have problems of dissatisfaction or professionalism in the process of specific jobs.
More importantly, the training system of mainland officials is not only the improvement of basic professional quality, but also a necessary way for officials to promote.Strive for better performance to achieve the promotion of personal positions.
These experiences in the mainland are exactly the problems of the current democratic system operation.The heads of the elections, as well as officials of various ministries and bureaus they were appointed by their political appointments, were generally questioned by Andrdquo; and Andrdquo; they often have insufficient political qualifications, insufficient experience, and even "employment of meat barrel politics andrdquo.Professional ability is lacking.Although they can be trusted and authorized by voters through votes, they often can't help the test of governance quality.However, the professional bureaucratic system that could have provided professional assistance has become at a loss because of the frequent changes of government officials. Professional subjects are subject to political needs and become the daily predicament of a democratic society.
The comparison of the two aspects cannot be denyed lightly based on ideological standards such as democracy and human rights.The development achievements of the mainland do not come from the friendly external environment, let alone luck, but because the mainland solves the problem of incentive mechanisms and system protection required for development. These experiences can surpass ideological and systematic differences. It is worth learning from all over the world.Taiwan naturally cannot be restrained by his own hands and a blind eye.
While Taiwan, the opposition and folk society, while maintaining the advantages of the existing political system, we must also learn from the advantages of the mainland. Only by learning from each other can we establish a benign competitive relationship.The criticism of the hilling bell -like -bell, thinking that the collapse of mainland China has not helped Taiwan's own upward improvement, and it will not help shorten the gap between the strength of the cross -strait industry.
