11 graduate students from China Huazhong Agricultural University on Tuesday (January 16) jointly reported that the professor was not academic. Within 72 hours, things had preliminary results.
The school issued a report on Friday (19th) in the early morning of the school. It was initially determined that the reported professor had academic misconduct and decided to stop all their positions and work in their schools.
The notice finally said that the school "adheres to academic inconsistency and the loss of ethics to the scratch tolerance", will further investigate the reporting issues, and deal with the discipline according to the final investigation conclusions.
Quickly determine academic misconduct
The 11 people published the report from the School of Animal Science and Technology and the School of Animal Medical Medicine from Huazhong Agricultural University, including two doctoral students and nine masters.They reported Huang Feiruo, a professor and doctoral tutor of the School of Animal Science and Technology at the school.
Public information shows that Huang Feiruo entered Huazhong Agricultural University to study undergraduate in 1999. After graduating from PhD in 2008, he stayed in school to teach. In 2017, he became a professor and blog director. He is currently the director of the Department of Nutrition and Feed Science.
Huang Feiruo's resumes have no shortage of provincial and national key scientific research projects, including national key basic research and development plans (973), "14th Five -Year Plan" national key research and development plan, Hubei Province science and technology research and development plan, etc.
After the joint report letter was released, I got a lot of attention that day and boarded Weibo hot search.Huazhong Agricultural University issued a statement on the afternoon of the 16th that paying attention to the online report information, a special class has been set up to start the investigation process.
The staff of the Propaganda Department of the Party Committee of Huazhong Agricultural University said the next day (17th) to reply to the media inquiry that it was investigating the matter, and the results would be announced as soon as possible.
The party Huang Feiruo also voiced on Thursday (18th).In an interview with upstream news, he said that after being reported, he was "tortured by spiritual torture" and also wrote a recovery material for students' reports.
For only 15 students, 11 people reported collectively. Huang Feiru said that "a student took the lead and he threatened others to report together."
In this regard, one of the students, Zhang Li, posted a Weibo on the same day that this is the biggest joke he has heard over the years, "reminds me of the poor when you fabricate the data."
However, the school issued a report a few hours later, and it was initially determined that Huang Feiruo had academic misconduct.
Zhang Li posted a Weibo on Friday morning, thanks to the netizens who followed the matter, but also said that this was far from the final result, but it was "preliminary determination", not "handling results".Here.
125 page report file
The report of 11 students can quickly gather public opinion. One of the important reasons is a report document of 125 pages.
This report document, the students used for nearly a month to prepare, and explained the problems existing in the academic papers of three doctoral students guided by Huang Feiruo from 2016 to 2023, including tamperingExperimental data, stitching modification experiment icons and data, changing experimental results, plagiarism papers, etc.
Files give multiple examples. For example, a data published by a mouse research can be used again, and no change in the data can be used.Report students summarize this approach as "moving rats and pigs".
In the papers accused of problematic, many articles for Huang Feiruo and participated in the National Natural Science Foundation of China.In addition, several papers reporting members as cooperative authors were also included.
In addition to this report document, 11 students also listed other issues of Huang Feiruo in the real -name joint reporting letter, including the labor expenses for students, deducting students, and forced students to conduct private jobs that have nothing to do with academic and scientific research.
According to the southern weekend report, a student reported that Huang Fei will call the students as "the person below"; occasionally forgetting the student's name, it is called "who".In addition, in the academic guidance, Huang Feiruo also feedback to students is mostly format.
One of the students, one of the students Zhang Li, enlightened the fourth grade this year, and can graduate with a doctorate degree after a few months.He wrote the article and said, "I understand the importance of my doctorate than anyone else than anyone." "I also know that when I made this decision, I graduated in June to me."" ".
He then wrote: "But someone always does something that looks stupid but correct."
The students who reported with Zhang Li Yiyi also emphasized this in both the report letter or interview with the media, that is, I do not want someone to face similar situations in the next way, to teach scientific research and learning in academic fraud in academic fraud.The enthusiasm of the people does not want to provoke academic ethics to double the fame and fortune.
Academic Non -endless Breaks
In China, there has been a long time for academic fraud.
Lu Mou, a master's degree from Tianjin University, reported in real name in November 2020. Zhang Yuqing, a professor of chemical engineering from the School of Chemical Engineering from 2011 to 2020, fakes many times and published it.His daughter published papers and so on.In the same month, Tianjin University determined that Zhang Yuqing's academic dislocation was true, and the termination of the employment contract.
Cao Xuetao, president of Nankai University and academician of the Chinese Academy of Engineering, was also exposed after 18 papers in November 2019.In the same month, Rao Yi, the former dean of the School of Life Academy of Life and the President of the Capital Medical University, also reported the real name of the three academic circles to fraud, including Li Hongliang, Dean of the School of Basic Medicine of Wuhan University, Pei Gang, Academician of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, and Academic Institute of the Chinese Academy of Sciences.Geng Meiyu.
The five departments of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China established the "Joint Work Mechanism of Joint Conference on Integrity Construction Construction" in December of that year to conduct investigations on Cao Xuetao, Li Hongliang, Li Hongliang, Geng Meiyu and Rao Yi.For fraud, only the papers of Li Hongliang and Geng Meiyu have "misuse of pictures."
Since 2023, Hindawi and other foreign publishing institutions have withdrawn a large number of papers published by Chinese scholars.The Ministry of Education of China issued a notice this month, requiring colleges and universities to carry out self -examination of dissertation papers.
Zhu Bangfen, an academician of the Department of Physics at Tsinghua University, said in an interview with the Science and Technology Daily in 2018 that he saidThe reason for the endless ban in China is that the risks are not commensurate with the harvest. The major typical case investigation of serious academic incomplete cases is not thorough and the treatment is extremely light.
Pei Gang himself also said that in punishing academic fraud, "one (big) tiger is more obvious than playing 100 flies."
The 21st Century Education Research Institute's dean issued a document after the report that some schools made the number of papers as a political achievement. Therefore, after the scientific researchers "accidents", they subconsciously "protect them".
The current environment of anti -corruption in many fields has achieved achievements, providing students with soil that dares to stand up in real names.Under the pressure of public opinion, the school also made a quick decision.
If things are notified with the school's paper situation, it may come to an academic fraud case in the future.If this can be used as a starting point to establish a set of norms that punish academic inconsistencies, and reduce the occurrence of such behaviors from the system, maybe Chinese students who are still enthusiastic about scientific research will no longer need to gamble on the future like 11 people from Huazhong Agricultural University.And fate to shout.
