On May 26, a reporter from Nandu learned from Tesla that Tesla's top vitamin owners who lasted two years sued Tesla to infringe their reputation cases and Tesla's personal privacy case finally fell into a hammer.The court rejected the request of the ladies of the car, and Tesla won the lawsuit.In this regard, Tesla told Nandu reporters that the content of the judgment shall prevail and not respond to other issues.Previously, these two cases have been publicly tried, but have not been judged yet.
Nandu previously reported that another dispute between Ms. Zhang and Tesla, that is, Tesla complained about the owner of the roof of the roof to violate the right to reputation and claim a case of 5 million yuan, and will open on June 6.
April 19, 2021, Ms. Zhang was on April 19, 2021. On April 19, 2021, Ms. Zhang was on April 19, 2021. Ms. Zhang was on April 19, 2021.The Shanghai Auto Show Tesla exhibition is right.
Nandu reporters learned from the civil judgment that in response to Ms. Zhang's case of violating her reputation rights, the court held that the Tesla car purchased by Ms. Zhang had a traffic accident after one year of use, and she questioned the quality of the product.Because the product quality controversial negotiation failed, Ms. Zhang parked the accident vehicle that sprayed the word "brake failure" to a public place, and then wearing a shirt printed with the word "brake failure" in Shanghai in ShanghaiEssence
Tesla Beijing Company and their staff members mentioned in the "team", "whitewashing", "she are only willing to compensate" and other contents mentioned in an interview with the media.In the process, the relevant facts and the response to Ms. Zhang's demands. Although the wording is not rigorous enough, it does not use insulting words, nor does it deliberately degrades and uglown Ms. Zhang and Li XX's personality.And Tesla Shanghai, such as the company, violated the reputation of Ms. Zhang and Li XX.The court did not support the lawsuit claimed by Ms. Zhang and Li XX.
In response to Ms. Zhang's case of violating her personal privacy in Ms. Zhang, the court pointed out that after the negotiation between the two parties failed, Tesla responded to Ms. Zhang's questioning.The vehicle data involved in the vehicle accident, including the vehicle accident, is provided to the market supervision newspaper with text description.It only described and explained the relevant data, and could not be associated with Ms. Zhang's personal private information.
In addition, before Tesla's processing of the information, Ms. Zhang herself has publicized the vehicle data involved in the vehicle data on her Weibo.The above -mentioned behavior implemented by the Tesla and the Market Supervision News Agency is not illegal. It does not exceed the reasonable scope when dealing with the public information that has been disclosed, and does not cause the personal information of Ms. Zhang.Regarding Ms. Zhang's claiming that Tesla will selectively and openly and maliciously guide public opinion, and infringe on her legitimate rights and interests, it lacks facts and legal basis. The court will not accept it.The behavior of the Tesla and the Market Supervision News Agency did not constitute infringement of Ms. Zhang's personal information. Therefore, the court did not support the claim claim requests.
In response to the above judgments, Tesla told Nandu reporters that the court judgment content prevails and does not respond to other issues.
Ms. Zhang, a reporter from Nandu, another dispute between Tesla, that is, Tesla complained that Ms. Zhang violated the right to reputation and claimed a case of 5 million yuan, which will be postponed until June 6.On May 15th, Ms. Zhang told Nandu reporters that she was actively preparing for the case for the case, including retrieved some similar complaint files.
Caiwan: Nandu reporter Feng Yiran
