Taiwan Jiuhe 1 (local public official election) ended on Saturday (November 26). The Kuomintang questioned the Pingtung County Mayor's election to open the ticket.The Central Election Commission stated that there was no abnormal and accurate invoicing for the whole process. I hope that candidates can accept the election results with a rational verification and peaceful heart; they will take judicial channels for candidates to take judicial channels for the election results.
Comprehensive Taiwan United Daily News and Central News Agency reported that according to the results of the votes of the election, Zhou Chunmi, the candidate of the Democratic Progressive Party Pingtung County Mayor Zhou Chunmi, won 217,537 votes, the Kuomintang candidate Su Qingquan 206,460 votes, and the timesPower candidate Zhan Zhijun 19156 votes.Zhou Chunmi led Su Qingquan for 11,077 votes and was elected to Pingtung County Mayor.
However, a press conference held on Monday (28th) of the Kuomintang Legislative Yuan of the Kuomintang Legislative Yuan said that the Pingtung County Mayor Election was only 440,000 votes, and it took five hours to count the votes to complete.Changed, he questioned the Pingtung County Election Committee in major flaws in the process of invoicing and voting; Su Qingquan had gone to the Pingtung District Court to check the ticket inspection at 10 am.
The National Election Association responded through the press release that on the evening of November 26th, the votes were selected and counted.It is also the same as the data of invoicing centers in all parts of Taiwan, and other elections or referendums can be reviewed by the outside world.
The Chinese Election Association said that since the vote, some people have questioned that the number of votes in Pingtung County is more than the county mayor votes, or that the number of elections has been changed at arbitrarilization of the number of elections has been changed, which is inconsistent with the facts.
The Chinese Election Association stated that when the invoicing on November 26, the main candidates in Pingtung County had a promoter, and the supervisors returned the votes of each voting office.The China Election Association and the local election committee also confirmed that the invoicing places were involved. The main candidates also recommended supervisors to monitor tickets according to law, and returned to the main candidate campaign headquarters.
The Chinese Election Association stated that for the Pingtung County Mayor election, candidates cannot accept the election results. Both the Election Association and the Pingtung County Election Commission can understand, but I hope that after the relevant information is clarified again, the candidate will be clarified, and the candidateCan accept the election results with a rational verification and peaceful heart; for candidates to adopt judicial channels for the election results, the Election Association and the Pingtung County Election Commission are still respected.
The Chinese Election Association said that in fact, some media or television companies report ticket errors, which are caused by the media or television companies' self -filter tickets.The verification refers to "the number of candidate votes is transferred to the mismatches" and the "Election Council Investigation" was set. In fact, there is no such situation.
The Chinese Election Association pointed out that the media was found on the night of the 26th invoicing, and the media immediately asked the media to immediately correct and clarify.Released "Earlier this station Zhou Chunmi and Su Qingquan's votes were misunderstood, and it was not related to the Election Council" and other clarification messages.
The Pingtung County Party Department of the DPP also issued a statement to criticize Su Qingquan not to rest, misuse the media, plant the number of votes for the election committee, and ask him to stop discrediting the election staff and tear Taiwan, causing democracy to be democratic, causing democracyfall back.
