The "stinky meat" incident in the cafeteria of the Yunnan Guandu School has resurrected.

According to Yingxiang.com, in response to the "stinky meat" incident on the Changfeng School cafeteria of Yunzi Middle School in Yunnan, Yunnan, in the early morning of October 17th, the public account of "Kunming Officials" public account was notifiedThe smell is abnormal, and law enforcement officers seize the ingredients of the cafeteria.At present, it has been investigated in schools and enterprises involved, and the school cafeteria has stopped meals.

On the afternoon of October 17, the school organized many parents of students to enter the school face -to -face communication dialogue.However, as the meeting was about to end, the chairman of the school ignored the questions of the parents and left the seat, which once again caused public dissatisfaction.

video screen show, the communication meeting, the parents shouted, "Don't leave the chairman" (the chairman should not leave "(the chairSource: Social Platform Video Screenshot)

In the case of food safety of campus, and there are many "previous cars", there are still school cafeteria suspected to provide students with deterrent meat. The nature of this matter can be described as very harsh, and the problems behind them should not be underestimated.However, the school, as the "protagonist" of the "stinky meat" incident, makes people dare not compliment.

It stands to reason that after such a thing has appeared, the official has also been involved in the investigation. The school has done a good job in communicating with parents in time. The response of the response and the apology of the apology must be at least "rejoicing" with the parents, and alsoIt's the most basic requirement.

School organizations have taken face -to -face communication, which has taken an important step in this direction.But from the actual situation, this communication is obviously difficult to say.In particular, the chairman of the school ignored the parents 'asking "inserting away from the seat" and further ignited the parents' anger, which can be called the negative sample of the incident.

Such avoidance and arrogance not only form a clear contrast with the responsible attitude of parents' expectations, but also leave more questions to the public: how to solve the problem so arrogant?How can people believe that such schools can truly ensure good campus food safety?

It is worth noting that some media sort out the "business landscape" of the chairman involved in the event that this "business person mainly runs schools" has 27 actual control enterprises, most of which are training institutions orSchools and kindergartens.In this, there are 19 places in survival, and 8 are being canceled.In addition, there are 31 related companies, and they also hold their positions among 29 companies.

Such a huge "business landscape", coupled with the arrogance shown in the event communication, has to cause further questioning: other schools and kindergartens, the sanitary conditions and food safety issues under the name of this chairman, whetherCan people be assured?Is the "stinky meat" problem of negligence or long -term usual operation?

In this regard, the official level may also be "packaged and investigated" to clear the doubts of parents with authoritative conclusions: if there is a problem, you should have zero tolerance and find out. If there is no problem, you should clarify in time to avoid the spread of the trust crisis.

After the

Stinky meat incident caused attention, many netizens found that the cost of studying in private schools involved in the incident was as high as 24,000 yuan a year.This also exacerbates the anger of the onlookers: the tuition fee is so expensive, and it actually provides students with "stinky meat"?

Such doubts can be said to be human being, but they must also be alert to the misunderstanding: that is, whether the tuition fee is high, whether the public or private, to ensure the safety of the campus food, avoid letting the deterioration of metamorphic foods such as "stinky meat" inflow intoThe campus is the basic bottom line, and there is no reason to break through.

At the same time, the common sense that needs to be reiterated is that those "businessmen" who are "running schools" must first have a stronger sense of responsibility and empathy.If you can be fearless on the health and safety of students, and even treat parents with a "stinky attitude" after the accident, this not only loses the sense of public morality and social responsibility as a educator, but also deviates from the basic basisModern business ethics is destined to be far away, and it will pay.

Contribution/Chongzhou Editor/Ma Xiaolong School Division/Zhang Yanjun