In February this year, China Judgment Document Network announced the second trial judgment of Qi Mei, former director of the Profile Syndrome Appraisal Center of the Jilin Provincial Public Security Department.The judgment shows that the female cadre received 550,000 and 600,000 yuan (RMB, the same, the same, the same, 110,000 and 120,000 yuan) in 2009 and 2014, but they did not help it twice.She was also reported twice.
According to China Surging News today (20th), the Criminal Ruling of the Second Trial of Qi Mei Crime was introduced.Daily was detained, the bail pending trial was obtained on August 5 of the same year, and was arrested on June 4, 2018.
Earlier, the People's Court of Chaoyang District of Changchun City tried to hear the case of the defendant Qi Mei in Chaoyang District of Changchun City.After the sentence, the defendant of the original trial was dissatisfied and appealed.
The original judgment determined that in early 2009, the defendant Qi Mei was entrusted by Huang Hongda and Guo Lidong to help him handle the engineering project in Lishu County Experimental Primary School.Liu Zide, then the director of the Literature and Sports Bureau of Lishu County, asked him to help it. On May 27, 2009, Qi Mei charged Huang Hongda and Guo Lidong RMB 550,000 in the name of the project required for the project.Later, due to the failure of the matter, Huang Hongda and Guo Lidong repeatedly found Qi Mei for 550,000 yuan. Qi Mei returned 300,000 yuan to 300,000 yuan on December 6, 2010, December 13, 2010, and September 5, 2011.Essence
In May 2013, Huang Hongda and Guo Lidong reported Qi Mei to the Supervisory Office of the Public Security Department of Jilin Province. After the disciplinary inspection commissions intervened in the investigation, Qi Mei will be cleared at 250,000 yuan on July 14, 2014.In this regard, the Jilin Provincial Supervision Department in the Provincial Public Security Department's Supervisory Office shall be given the administrative dismissal of Qimei in March 2015 (from the chief staff member to the science member).
In addition, between July and August 2014, the defendant Qi Mei learned that Wenzhou Mall in Gongling City, Jilin Province was notified of hidden dangers in the province.In this project, Li Dangang proposed Li Jincheng (handling another) to do this project. Qi Mei led Li Jincheng and Zhang Jiasi (Li Jincheng's brother -in -law) to the Wenzhou Mall of Wenzhou Mall, Princess Ridge, to find the assistant to Meng Qingwen, director of the Management Committee of the Wenzhou Mall.Helping this matter, Meng Qingwen promised to help within the scope of authority.On August 24, 2014, Qi Mei received Li Jincheng's cost of 600,000 yuan. On August 25, 2014, Qi Mei opened a bank card with his own name and gave it to Meng Qingwen.
By October 2014, in the case of the project's failure, Meng Qingwen contacted Qi Mei to retrieve a bank card with 400,000 yuan, but the incident did not tell Li Jinsheng.In August 2015, Li Jincheng saw that the matter was not done, and learned that Qi Mei had retrieved the money that had been given to Meng Qingwen, so he asked Qi Mei for 600,000 yuan in service fees.And issued an IOU from Li Jincheng.Later, Li Jincheng reported Qi Mei's criminal behavior to the Discipline Inspection Commission of Jilin Provincial Public Security Department.The defendant Qi Mei did not return 600,000 yuan to Li Jincheng at the time of the incident.
The court of first trial believes that the defendant Qi Mei gives state staff with property to obtain unfair interests, and his behavior has constituted a crime of bribery and should be punished according to law.The facts and charges accused by the public prosecution agency are supported.The defendant Qi Mei gave Huang Hongda and Guo Lidong for the criminal preparation for engineering projects, and it was comprehended to be punished by lightly.The defendant Qi Mei could truthfully confess his crimes after arriving in the case.The first trial was sentenced to three years in prison. Qi Mei bribed 400,000 yuan in bribes to collect, and the illegal income of 200,000 yuan was confiscated.The defendant Qi Mei bribed 550,000 yuan from Huang Hongda and Guo Lidong.
The appellant Qi Mei appealed and his defender proposed that the first briber of the original trial determined that Qi Mei's first bribery was that the crime was incorrect, and the first eyebrows did not constitute a crime.The second one left for the 200,000 yuan privately, and the original judgment was determined that the income was wrong.The original trial determined that Qi Mei did not meet the improper conditions of probation, and the original judgment was too heavy.
The second instance of the Changchun Intermediate People's Court of the Second instance found that the original trial was clearly determined that the defendant's bribery was clear.In the judgment, the court listed the evidence of determining the facts of the case. The relevant evidence showed and proved the court during the trial of the first instance.After a comprehensive review of the collegiate panel, the facts identified in the first instance and the evidence listed in the trial were confirmed.Several reasons and defense opinions of the appellant Qi Mei are not adopted.The Changchun Intermediate People's Court ruled that the appeal was rejected and the original sentence was maintained.
