Original title: Questioning Secretary Yan's daughter incident: Three major questions to be answered
Secretary Yan Chunfeng attended the event (first from the right)
Cnr.cn, Beijing, May 16. According to the Voice of China news report, starting from last weekend, a group of screenshots of chats from the parent group of Golden Apple Kindergarten in Chengdu, Sichuan, quickly evolved into a series.
The screenshots that began to circulate on the 11th showed that the parent, Li, was dissatisfied with the teacher's way of educating her daughter, and moved out a strict secretary.Li asked the teacher: What do you mean by saying this to Secretary Yan's daughter!Later, Li declared in the parent group: the teacher has been expelled.
On the 12th, a statement written by Secretary Yan to the Organization Department of the Sichuan Provincial Party Committee appeared on the Internet.From this, it is known that Secretary Yan is Yan Chunfeng, deputy secretary of the Sichuan Guang'an Municipal Party Committee.He stated in the statement: Because of Li’s cheating, he has been divorced from Li for five years, and the child belongs to Li. Therefore, Yan Chunfeng himself is ignorant of all issues. This statement has not been confirmed by the media, nor by Yan Chunfeng.I deny it.
This two-page explanation was appreciated by netizens at the beginning. Everyone thought that Yan Chunfeng's explanation was more detailed, and he probably didn't make jokes about his wife's cheating.But on the 13th, another set of screenshots from the parent group turned things around.The reporter sorted out three major questions raised by netizens.
Question 1: Does Deputy Secretary Yan know nothing about it?
In the screenshot, some parents questioned Yan Chunfeng's ignorance.The parent said that Deputy Secretary Yan came to the class last week to give lectures to the children, and occasionally picked up the children.Some parents directly pointed out that Yan Chunfeng was suspected of defrauding the organization, because they also have a young son who is more than three years old.The evidence is that he only saw Secretary Yan's family portrait last week, and the three-year-old son looks like the secretary's son.Since they have been divorced for five years, how can they have a three-year-old son?Yesterday, CNR reporter Jia Yichao also went to the Golden Apple Kindergarten for an interview. The parents of the teachers involved said that they did not want to talk about this matter any more, and the kindergarten security refused the reporter to enter.As to what role Deputy Secretary Yan played in it, we can only wait for the conclusion of the investigation by the relevant departments.
Question 2: Was the teacher involved fired?
The security guard at the Golden Apple Kindergarten said that the teacher involved was working normally.
Question 3: Can Deputy Secretary Yan afford the tuition fees for noble kindergartens?
Another issue that touches the sensitive nerves of the public is that Li once bragged to other parents in the group that his daughter was about to attend a key elementary school because her daughter was a designated student.Although the school involved quickly issued a statement saying it was seriously inaccurate, this obviously angered netizens, and some people further questioned: Golden Apple Kindergarten’s monthly tuition fee is more than 10,000 yuan, and the school bus fee is 2,000 yuan, which is obviously not cheap.
Some netizens searched and found that a company called Sichuan Zhong'an Construction Engineering Co., Ltd. has a shareholder list of Li, who is suspected to be the name of the deputy secretary's ex-wife, and a man named Yan Chunqing. The two hold a total of 50% of the shares.In addition, there are four companies under Li's name.Yan Chunqing and Yan Chunfeng, are they related?The reporter called Wang Weidong, a shareholder of Sichuan Zhongan Construction Engineering Co., Ltd. last night. He denied the statement that Yan Chunqing was among the shareholders of the company.
Netizens' questions have not yet been answered by authoritative departments.Public opinion continues to ferment, and the focus of attention has shifted from the issue of privilege to the issue of clean government.Yuan Jian, director of the Publicity Center of the Sichuan Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection, said in an interview with CCTV reporter Yang Ni that the Sichuan Provincial Commission for Disciplinary Inspection and Supervision has intervened in the investigation in a timely manner, and will announce the results of the investigation in due course.
With regard to online public opinion, the intervention of the party discipline and government discipline departments should be affirmed.However, in the case of Secretary Yan's public opinion, there is always a feeling that public opinion is always ahead of the investigation.
Issues involving privilege belong to oneself and others do not know about it, but the part involving clean government cannot rely on public opinion to keep an eye on it.Even if netizens don't ask, can the relevant departments rush to answer, so as not to let the originally not serious public opinion ferment to the point it is today?
Yang Weidong, a professor at the National School of Administration, believes that judging from the current cases of Internet public opinion fermenting, some government departments are still accustomed to passively answering questions instead of proactively discovering problems. This process mechanism is still lacking.More importantly, through individual cases, let the competent department sum up experience and sort out a set of more effective responses or internal corrections.The key is to build a series of investigation mechanisms in the process system, so that netizens will not ask questions and the beginning and end cannot be connected.
As some netizens said: Secretary Yan’s daughter is about to graduate from this kindergarten, and she has been in it for at least three years; in the three years, can the relevant departments discover the problems that netizens can find?Yang Weidong believes that Internet public opinion and government investigations should be both teammates and opponents, and it is necessary to form a healthy competition and effective cooperation between the two supervisions.Online public opinion and government investigations are not diametrically opposed.Netizens, media and public opinion reflect the public's concern about the issue.The management department and the media netizens are effectively connected, and an effective communication mechanism is established so that the relevant departments will not appear passive in the investigation.
From this perspective, the involvement of the Sichuan Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision is only the beginning of the response. We look forward to and firmly believe that the Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision can give a convincing result of the investigation and clarify the focus of netizens' doubts.Only in this way can a public opinion incident come to a successful conclusion.
