The Taipei Procuratorate was submitted to Taipei City and a number of long -term departures accepted to travel to Shanghai and other places.The three were allowed to pay the insurance.The Kuomintang chairman Zhu Lilun responded to this, which made many of the long -hearted fear of being a judicial selection based on political motivation.
Comprehensive reports of Taiwan United Daily, Dongsen News Cloud, and Zhongshi News Network, the DPP Taipei City Councilor broke the news, saying that the mainland made a private group to the mainland through the Taipei grassroots.It only costs 15,000 yuan (NT $ 637) for six days and five nights. It is questioned that the mainland is organized by the mainland.It is said that at least one -third of the Taipei City has gone to the mainland for receiving the entertainment of the mainland, affecting the election of Taiwan.
Investigation and investigation found that these are distributed in Wenshan District, Xinyi District, Songshan District, Zhongzheng District, Wanhua District, Taipei City.The seven regiments were divided into Shanghai, Qingdao, Harbin and other places. The last Friday (15th) did not return to Taiwan afternoon.
The Taipei Procuratorate Command and Investigation Bureau, Taipei City Police Department, and Immigration Department Taipei Specialty Team and other units.The case was investigated to violate the reverse osmosis law, the presidential vice presidential election removal law, and the public official election removal law.
After the prosecutor resulted in the newspaper, in the evening, he ordered Wenshan District to pay for the insurance for 80,000 yuan.Yuan Jianbao, the rest of the cases involved, please return to the case, and continue to trace the case in depth, and it is not ruled out that the summoning relevant persons clarify.
This case is the first reverse osmosis law case during which the Taipei Procuratorate was in Taiwan's election.
Zhu Lilun said that many miles have been interviewed in the mainland these days."It is not selected in China now, but (Taiwan) judicially."Judicial selection is entirely based on political motivation, based on the attitude of political parties, or based on certain specific positions.