(Taipei Comprehensive News) The former president Chen Shui -bian's son -in -law Zhao Jianming's internal line trading case involved 13 years ago was changed for three years yesterday to be the lightest period for the trial.
Comprehensive Free Times and Apple Daily reported that the Taiwan High Court ruled that in July 2005, Su Dejian, former chairman of Taiwan Land Development Corporation (Taiwan Kaikai), invited Zhao Jianming, then the son -in -law of Taiwan President Chen Shui -bian, and his father, Zhao Yuzhu, to Migo Japan.During the meal, Su Jiande revealed the news of Taiwan Cairi Duoduo. Zhao Jianming and his father jointly used his mother's account to buy 5,000 stocks at the price of 3.51 yuan per share (NT $, the same, S $ 0.16).
The other two defendants also bought 2100 shares and 5,000 shares at the same price.When they wait for the stock price to open the stock price rising, they have made their own profits at a price ranging from about 5 yuan to about 19 yuan per share.
The Taiwan High Court pronounced four trials yesterday, determining that the defendant was crime of violating the inside trading of the securities trading law.
Among them, Zhao Jianming was sentenced to three years, and his father Zhao Yuzhu was sentenced to two years, six months and fined 50 million yuan.Su Dejian was sentenced to two years and five years in probation.
The verdict also pointed out that this case has been in the first instance for more than eight years, and it is in line with the Speed Trial Law.
The judgment was the lightest torture in the trial. Zhao Jianming was sentenced to six years in the first instance, but the second trial to the three trials of the three trials changed from seven to four years.
During the four trials, Zhao Jianming said that he did not notice his identity (referred to as the son -in -law of the president) at that time to participate in the Mitsui Banquet, and was sorry for the derivative of many storms.
According to Lianhe News, Zhao Jianming's wife and Chen Shui -bian's daughter Chen Xingyu did not respond to the results of the judgment.
