Hong Kong and Macao Sudden Search
In my more than 20 years of news interviews, June 12, 2019 is definitely one of the most memorable days.In the first half of that year, the Hong Kong Democratic School continued to launch the activity of the amendment to the amendment of fugitives, including the so -called 1.03 million people on the streets on June 9th, and the intense political atmosphere in the society continued to heat up.However, the Lin Zheng government insisted that he would not give up, indicating that the meeting would submit the draft amendment to the Legislative Council on June 12 as scheduled on the draft of the Legislative Council.
Many demonstrators then gathered outside the Legislative Council Building, and rushed out of the road on June 12 to repeat the method of fighting for the "Occupy Central" movement in 2014.At nearly 3:00 that afternoon, the demonstrator tried to rush into the Legislative Council's demonstration area and was dispersed by the police with tear bullets and officially unveiled the anti -repair campaign for half a year.
At that time, the newspaper office I worked was just next to the Legislative Council.Due to the strong smoke in the Legislative Council, the demonstrators could not stand the pungent tear -elastic smell, and they ran to nearby large shopping malls to avoid it.So I rushed to the mall and saw that the scene was messy, and densely brought together a large number of young resistances. Many people carried eye masks, fresh paper and water in order to deal with police tear gas bullets.
Seeing these pictures, the first reaction in my mind was very shocked and doubtful: From the perspective of the small details of the demonstrators, Hong Kong society accumulated huge people in the morning.time.Why did the SAR government notice any signs?I have been thinking about this issue and reflecting on whether the role of Hong Kong media reports that the role of the people has failed.
After the Hong Kong Chief Executive Li Jiachao came to power last year, he also saw that the Hong Kong government failed to master the real social pulse.Master the people's sentiment.The official documents recently disclosed further. In the future, the Chief Executive policy team will not only restore the polls, but also use advanced technology to track digital public conditions.
As the Internet has become the main mode of life of the citizens, more and more governments in places have analyzed big data to observe public opinion.Objectively speaking, if the Chief Executive's policy group can strengthen the investigation of the people's sentiment, it will supplemented by science and technology, which will indeed make policies in the future and solve the problem of deep social and people's livelihood.
But then, in the current social atmosphere, if the Hong Kong government is not easy to master the real public opinion, it is not easy, and even facing many difficulties.
In the past, Hong Kong -made system and politicians of the people would rush to speak to occupy the position of public opinion. However, after the implementation of the Hong Kong National Security Law in the previous year, the first -tier characters of the democratic camp either went to jail or moved overseas, and almost all of them stayed.As a result, the public opinion presented by the media at the moment is the sound of the institutionalist, which brings great trouble to the people engaged in the research of the people: how can we master the true people's conditions?
For example, the Hong Kong Public Opinion Research Institute carried out a citizen identity survey on the eve of Hong Kong's 25th anniversary last year.The results of the survey show that Hong Kong people have written a new low record for five years, and the score of the "Chinese" identity has reached a new high.
Sure enough, in the past two years, hundreds of thousands of Hong Kong immigrants have been counted, which has reduced the ratio of Hong Kong people who oppose the government.But on the other hand, the biggest reason for the favorable data of the above survey is because the recipient may not dare to tell the truth.This does not mean that Hong Kong's deep problems have been resolved.If the Hong Kong Government and the central government think that the situation in Hong Kong, such as the survey, it has shown that the Guotai people have been seriously misjudged.
In fact, even if it is an anonymous online world, as the human meat search function is becoming more and more powerful, many people who have criticized or hold different opinions on the Hong Kong government have slowly silent and do not express their opinions on the Internet.If the Hong Kong Government must understand public opinion in social media, it will encounter greater challenges than before.
Among them, it is even more difficult to understand the real thoughts of young people.Adult Hong Kong people generally like to linger on social groups such as Facebook and WeChat;I communicated with some young people, especially the young people, and asked them what media they watched. The answers were often not traditional media or new media, but some unknown social groups or encrypted chat groups.How to master the activities of young people on social networks need to test official work urgently.
Take a step back, whether the network can completely reflect the true people's sentiment is also a problem.The Internet is undoubtedly more developed, and the time for people to focus on mobile phones and networks is increasing.However, the rich and poor in Hong Kong is very different. Many grass -roots families have difficulty on the Internet and have "digital poverty" difficulties. There are also many elders who rarely come into contact with the Internet, but many social and people's livelihood policies are related to them.If the Hong Kong Government is too superstitious about the people on the Internet, it actually ignores the grassroots and elderly groups in disguise.
In the final analysis, the Hong Kong government should understand the true people's conditions. In addition to doing good data analysis, it is still necessary to communicate with citizens with different classes and spectrums in society.When the official formulates policies, it is also necessary to be careful about the "curse of knowledge". It should not only be considered from the perspective of the government to think about the problem from the perspective of others.
