Liu Zhaojia, consultant of the National Hong Kong and Macau Research Association of China, believes that Hong Kong is currently more urgent to do a good job in economically and improve people's livelihood. There is no need to rush to complete 23 legislation of the Basic Law within these two years.

Lu Wenrui, vice chairman of the National Overseas Chinese Federation, listed four reasons on Monday (February 13) in Ming Pao to explain why Hong Kong should not start 23 legislation and consultation of Article 23 of the Basic Law this year.

Liu Zhaojia said in an interview with the online media "Hong Kong 01" that Hong Kong itself has more urgent problems to solve it. For example, if the epidemic retreats, how can Hong Kong and Mainland China get economically and improve people's livelihood.

He is expected to explode large -scale resistance or conflict in Hong Kong under the National Security Law of Hong Kong, but behind the seemingly peaceful surge, some soft confrontation can be seen in daily life, especially for young people.It can also be expected that the West will not stop through political intervention or support of the spokesperson.

The threat in other words is still there. Liu Zhaojia believes that it cannot completely disappear soft confrontation, but at least allowing the Hong Kong government to focus on solving the deep problems of society and promote long -term development strategies.At this stage, 23 legislation of the Hong Kong Basic Law provides disputes.He emphasized that legislation is necessary, but it is just a matter of urgent order.

As for whether the Taiwan election in the second half of the year is a delay of 23 legislative considerations, Liu Zhaojia said that according to his recent observations, some anti -communist anti -China propaganda in Taiwan has declined, especially last year, then the American House of Representatives PeroAfter visiting Taiwan in the west, it triggered the tension of the Taiwan Strait, which made the people of Taiwan recognize the unreliableness of the United States and had a subtle impact on their psychology. The DPP wanted to use Hong Kong to "draw tickets" on 23 legislation articles.