Poster Journalist Tianyang Guangzhou Report

More than 5 months later, the Shenzhen Municipal Transportation Bureau responded to the "Arctic Catfish" to show off wealth.The long -awaited survey results have not appeared.

On September 10, the People's Daily Shenzhen Douyin Account released a message. Some netizens posted a reply letter from the Shenzhen Municipal Transportation Bureau on the disclosure of government information, saying that the answer letter was aimed at Shenzhen"The response to the wealthy incident.The reply letter wrote: "After research, the public information you apply is not the information produced or obtained by our bureau in the process of performing administrative management functions, and does not belong to the government information referred to in Article 2 of the Government Information Disclosure Regulations of the People's Republic of China.In accordance with the provisions of Article 36, paragraph 3, paragraph 3 of the government information disclosure regulations of the People's Republic of China, our bureau has decided not to be disclosed. "

On September 12, poster journalists verified the situation to the Shenzhen Municipal Transportation Bureau on the response letter. The staff said that they would feedback the appeal to the mainstream department and the mainstream department would check it.As of press time, the reporter did not receive a reply.

No results in the progress of the investigation by repeated inquiries

The "former Director of Transportation Director" in Shenzhen has been exposed for more than 5 months since the exposure of the wealth of wealth in March this year.The Shenzhen Municipal Transportation Bureau replied to netizens' attention from the report to conduct a verification to the investigation and waiting for the report, and then to the answer "not to be disclosed", many netizens said: "Wait a loneliness."

In March 2023, netizens named "Arctic Catfish" sent "9 digits in the family" on the social platform, and the family "felt greedy" and "moist" to Australia.After being questioned to show off wealth, the "Arctic Catfish" also released a large number of improper remarks of the Chinese people, which caused the netizens to be angry, asking the Shenzhen Municipal Transportation Bureau to investigate the grandfather of the former director Zhong Mou -"Arctic Catfish".

After the incident was fermented, the Shenzhen Municipal Transportation Bureau issued a report on March 24, saying that it had conducted a verification on relevant information and will be notified in a timely manner.On the same day, there were media reports that the Shenzhen Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision and Supervision and Supervision of the Second Discipline Inspection and Supervision was investigating and verifying the relevant issues of the former Shenzhen Transportation Bureau Freight Management Branch, Zhong Mou,

On April 25, some media asked the relevant progress of the Shenzhen Municipal Transportation Bureau, but there was still no results.

On June 29, the relevant departments have not issued an announcement. The Shenzhen Municipal Discipline Inspection Commission stated that it was still investigating the matter and waiting for the announcement.

On August 25, a reporter from Dahui called the Shenzhen Municipal Transportation Bureau's total duty room to understand the relevant progress, but the staff who answered the phone called could not answer.The reporter also called the disciplinary inspection and supervision report by the Shenzhen Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection, and the staff said "follow -up situation and other notifications."

Until September 10, netizens posted a reply letter from the Shenzhen Municipal Transportation Bureau to "non -disclosure".

"No disclosure" allows netizens to question "arrogance of power"

Many netizens see "arrogance of power" in the response letter of the Shenzhen Municipal Transportation Bureau.

During the investigation time of more than 5 months, netizens have been paying attention to the progress of the matter, but the response of "no disclosure" allows netizens to question whether the relevant departments are using the time to quietly pass the incident.

"Things have passed half a year, and the Shenzhen Transportation Bureau still did not give any statement about this incident. It was clear that it was dragging time, dragging this matter and then everyone. After all, in many people, the Internet is the Internet.No memory, things passed. "

"In fact, no wonder the Shenzhen Transportation Bureau can't find it until now. A few months ago, some media revealed that the Arctic Catfish family had immigrated to Australia. At present, the Zhong family in the country has also been in important positions. Since it is not good, it is not good.Check, then just check it out! "

However, there are also relevant persons that after the incident, the Shenzhen Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision will be stationed in the second disciplinary inspection and supervision team to investigate and verify the relevant issues of the former Shenzhen Transportation Bureau Freight Management Branch Zhong Mou.In other words, the related issues of "Arctic Catfish" have already attracted great attention from the Shenzhen Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection. Netizens applying for disclosure information does not belong to the government information referred to in Article 2 of the Government Information Disclosure Regulations of the People's Republic of China.

According to the weekend report of the rule of law, some people in the legal community believe that netizens applied to the Shenzhen Municipal Transportation Bureau for the investigation results of the "Arctic Catfish" incident in the form of "applying for government information disclosure"."Investigation information" does not belong to government information.

In this way, if it is announced, the final result can only be released through the Shenzhen Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection.

Netizens look forward to the results of public and fair and fair survey

A "show off the wealth" incident has triggered national attention. All netizens want are only an open, fair and fair survey result, rather than no following, and have a tough response to "no disclosure."

Professor Huang Jie, a professor at the Law School of Hunan Normal University, said in an interview with the media: "Although the investigation information of whether the civil servant violates the disciplinary is not the government information, the netizens cannot obtain it by applying for government information disclosure.After the incident, after the investigation, the results of the handling should still be disclosed to the society according to relevant legal rules. "

The series of operations of the

The "Arctic Catfish" incident has slowed the credibility of Shenzhen's relevant departments.If you blindly hold the attitude of cold treatment and wait for the decline in public opinion, the public's trust in relevant departments will only be lower and lower.It is hoped that when the "Arctic Catfish" incident is discussed next time, the relevant departments can give the public a answer they want.