Hong Kong Security Director Deng Bingqiang believes that the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government's crackdown on "soft confrontation" will not stifle Hong Kong's soft power.

Deng Bingqiang reiterated on Monday (July 24) in response to the Hong Kong Sing Tao Daily that endangering national security is a serious crime, which may cause very serious consequences, including national division, subversion of state power, and being subverted by state power, and being subverted by state power, subversion of state power, subversion of state power, and being subverted by state power, and being subverted by national regimes.Terrorist activities, etc.Therefore, the Hong Kong Government has the responsibility to blow up and investigate it.

Deng Bingqiang said that it is necessary to do the best to crack down on "soft confrontation"."I never agree with the relevant remarks, and the consideration of the" marginal effect "should be added, and it will never agree that the new stage of" Zhi and Xing "should be relaxed or can be relaxed." This is an absolutely impossible thing to compromise.No matter when and wherever, the Hong Kong government must be in peace and must not take it lightly. When encountering behaviors such as "soft confrontation", you must do your best to hit the headache.

He said that there have been many social chaos in Hong Kong in the past 20 years, which eventually led to the anti -repair routine in 2019.The cause is that some people use the "soft confrontation" methods such as the media, culture and art, to incite others to hate the central, Hong Kong government and law enforcement officers, advocate violence, and encourage others not to abide by the law.

Deng Bingqiang also said that he never agreed to say that most of the current behavior was attributed to "soft confrontation" in order to control citizens 'thoughts; in fact, the Hong Kong Guoan Law will not affect the proper exercise of Hong Kong residents' just exercise.Freedom of speech, criticizing the government's governance or policy and decision will not affect information freedom, academic freedom, and literary creation."The bottom line of the Hong Kong National Security Law and the provisions of incitement is very clear."

He also said that the law on the incitement of crimes is definitely not to suppress a legally criticism of the Hong Kong government because of the objective facts, because these are these because these are because theseCriticism has been excluded from incitement.