The Kuomintang legislators call on Chen Jianren, an academician of the Taiwan Central Research Institute, if he wants to serve as the president of Taiwan, it should be publicly explained to plagiarism in the paper.

According to the Taiwan China Times on Thursday (January 26), in 2007, Chen Jianren contributed to the international journal Cancer during his time as the chairman of the National Science Council., Triggers uproar.The Kuomintang legislator Lai Shizheng called on Chen Jianren to come out as the executive director, and he should first explain the matter and academic standards to the public.

Lai Shizheng also criticized that Zheng Wencan, who was said to take over as the deputy dean of the Taiwan Executive Yuan, was revoked because of plagiarism.

Chen Jianren, as the head of academic ethics, was involved in the academic plagiarism storm. He made a written speech to the then Dean Su Zhenchang of the Executive Yuan at the time on the grounds of "deep guilt", but finally comforted.

However, this incident has since become a stain of Chen Jianren's academic career and entangled him for many years. When Cai Yingwen asked him to partner as a candidate for Zheng and Vice President in 2015, the papers were suspected of plagiarism.Public explanation said that "improper copying, not plagiarism", and lamented, "I didn't expect negative elections to start so soon."

Chen Jianren explained at the time that this paper was about lung cancer. The main author was a doctor Chen.There are part of the papers that copy the other parts of the paper without rewriting. "After reviewing, he found that there was an improper copy. Therefore, he was corrected after contacting Yang Yanchi. The final paper was published, so it was not plagiarism.

Tsai Ing -wen also said at the time that Cancer was a quite authoritative academic journal. If Chen Jianren's co -names involved plagiarism, such a well -known international magazine would not be published.

Lai Shizhen said that Chen Jianren had been an academic position in academic posts of academicians and other academicians, and should be more rigorous in academic requirements. The first thing to serve as Pavilion should publicly explain to the public that he had been involved in plagiarism, and it was clear.What is the attitude and requirements for plagiarism?