News world
Zhang Wenhong, an expert in the well -known Chinese anti -crown disease epidemic, recently involved in a public opinion war, because he said that the world must learn to coexist with the coronary virus, and was criticized by some public opinion as "surrenderIsm.
On July 29, Zhang Wenhong published a long article on Weibo, including: the crown disease epidemic will not end in the short term, and may not end in the long term;They all recognize that this is a resident virus, and the world must learn to coexist with this virus; how the world coexists with the virus, and all countries are making their own answers; China has given a beautiful answer sheet; the way China chooses in the future must be bothEnsure the community of destiny with the world, realize the interoperability with the world, return to normal life, and at the same time to ensure the fear of the virus from the virus; China should have such wisdom.
Zhang Wenhong wants to say that under the long -term existence of coronary virus, China must come up with wisdom in the future, to achieve interoperability with the world, return to normal life, but also to ensure that the people are exempted from viruses from viruses.Fear.In other words, because the cost is too high, China may give up the "clear zero" measures now.However, Zhang Wenhong not only did not deny that China has strictly guarded against the resistance to resist, but also praised China to give a beautiful answer.
It is not difficult to see that Zhang Wenhong only analyzes and think about the trend of the epidemic and how China should respond to the epidemic in the future. This is also the right and responsibility of an expert.
On August 5th, the former Minister of Health, the Ministry of Health, retired for many years, published articles on the official website of the China Health Economics Society to refute the view of "coexisting with the virus".
Gao Qiang believes that the idea of "coexisting with the virus" must be dispelled;"It is self -conflict; as long as the epidemic is still widespread internationally, China's policy of strictly prevent the input of overseas virus cannot be changed. The strategy of resolutely cutting off the virus infection chain cannot be changed, and the goals of early discovery and early control cannot change.
In addition to Gao Qiang, Professor Zhang Yitu, Professor of Peking University, also published an article on the Global Times, pointing out that "coexisting with the virus" is like "persuading a test score to be far better than the students who are born afterwards.It's not for China, but don't have a deep meaning. "The article calls on China to continue to prevent and control comprehensively, and not to win the "serial plan" in the West.
On August 7, Gao Qiang's article was reproduced by the Health Times of the People's Daily. In addition to Zhang Yiwu's article on the Global Times, some self -media interpreted this as the official media who criticized Zhang Wenhong, which caused "The saliva war between the coexistence of the virus and the "zero virus clearing faction".Some netizens accused Zhang Wenhong of "surrenderism", while others shouted the slogan of "defending Zhang Wenhong".
In fact, the mainstream official media did not get involved in this saliva war.On the Internet, Zhang Wenhong's voice was obviously more criticized than criticizing his volume.This shows that the official is not currently selected in this saliva.
The background of this saliva war is that Western countries have recently adjusted the epidemic prevention policies, began to unblock internal and open, and explore new "coexisting with viruses" work and lifestyle.In China, the spread of the Nanjing epidemic has once again caused some regional economic and social life to stop, and it has also caused the society to "resist fatigue fatigue". Many people want to control the epidemic as soon as possible and be tired of the inconvenience caused by strict prevention and control measures.Hope to find a balance between the two.Zhang Wenhong's "coexisting with the virus" reflects this sound.
It is necessary to point out that Zhang Wenhong's "coexisting with the virus" is not to surrender to the virus, nor is it required to immediately abandon the still effective prevention and control policy.And Gao Qiang and others criticized the view of "coexisting with the virus", nor did they want to restore China to lock the country and become the world's "islands". It is more worried that the hard -won prevention results in China are destroyed.
But in the long run, regardless of criticism or not, how "coexist with the virus" is a topic that China cannot get around.Zhang Wenhong inspired this topic, showing his scholar style who always seek truth and pragmatic "grounding".As for the saliva war brought by the topic, it is neither Zhang Wenhong's original intention nor he can control.
