The Jilin Provincial Higher People's Court sentenced Li Ning, an academician of the Chinese Academy of Engineering and a professor at the Chinese Agricultural University on the 8th.
According to CCTV News, the Matsuhara Municipal Intermediate People's Court determined that from July 2008 to February 2012, Li Ning used the professor of Chinese agricultural universities, the director of the National Key Laboratory of the Agricultural Biotechnology of China Agricultural University, and the Biology of Chinese Agricultural UniversityThe person in charge of the college Li Ning's research group and the convenience of managing a number of major national scientific and technological special project funds for the convenience. The defendant Zhang Lei has adopted the methods such as invading swallow, fictional invoices, and labor expenditures.Among them, the subjects of the corruption research group were more than 20.92 million yuan.The above -mentioned funds were transferred to the accounts controlled by Li Ning and Zhang Lei to Li Ning's personal control and used to invest in many companies such as Li Ning and other companies.
Earlier trials believed that the behavior of the two defendants had constituted a crime of corruption.In the joint crime, Li Ning took the main role and was the main criminal.Zhang Lei has played a secondary role. He is a crime, has a frank plot, and confess his guilty. He can reduce his punishment according to law.The court of first instance judged Li Ning for crime of corruption, sentenced to 12 years in prison, and fined 3 million yuan.It is confiscated and paid to the state treasury, and the insufficient parts continue to be recovered.After the sentence, Li Ning appealed.
During the trial of the second instance of the Jilin Provincial Higher People's Court, the appellant Li Ning voluntarily pleaded guilty and submitted a regret letter, and signed a confession and conclusion of the confession.During the trial of the second trial, Li Ning had no objection to the facts, evidence and judgment identified by the original trial judgment. He expressed his guilty and regrets in court. The appeal requested the court of the second instance to be punished lightly according to law, and was willing to accept the court's penalties.According to Li Ning's guilty attitude, the procuratorate put forward the sentencing suggestions for the second trial.
After the court, the collegiate panel conducted a serious evaluation, believed that the original trial decided that the appellant Li Ning and the defendant Zhang Lei, the defendant of the original trial.The trial procedure is legal.In view of the confession and confession during Li Ning's second instance, the sentencing of the appellant Li Ning should be changed.According to the procuratorial organs put forward sentencing suggestions, the court made the above -mentioned second trial judgment.
In the second trial, the appellant Li Ning's close relatives participated in the listening. At the same time, they invited some representatives of the National People's Congress of the country and Jilin Province, members of the CPPCC, and some media representatives and representatives of society.
