In addition to the Tibetan guy Ding Zhen and Tai Chi, a red horse in Tai Chi, one has recently become popular on the lively Internet in China.The unsteady young artist Shen Jiaxin, who was not famous, publicly questioned the Chinese Academy of Engineering's academician Zhong Nanshan on Weibo last Friday (27th), and was instantly pushed to the forefront of public opinion.Surprisingly not only her criticism of Zhong Nanshan's spicy provocations, but also some netizens' support for her.
Soon after Shen Jiaxin issued a question, Sina deleted her Weibo avatars, and also forbidden her account for 15 days on the grounds of malicious marketing.The Huayi Brothers of the Entertainment Group immediately clarified the relationship with Shen Jiaxin, who claimed to be an artist, and said that he reserved the right to investigate the law.There are naturally many netizens who have discussed Shen Jiaxin, saying that she is ignorant and why he questioned the anti -epidemic heroes and other remarks.These are all expected, but the sound of Shen Jiaxin's sound is also one after another. Although weak, the influence of Zhong and Shen seems to be so ridiculous, and the sinking voice looks extraordinarily harshly harsh.Essence
In that blog post of more than a hundred words, he asked Zhong Nanshan how he contributed during the epidemic, and pointed out that he endorsed Baiyun Mountain's Banlangen.She is ironic and aggressive, not a serious and rational question, but an emotional venting and unsatisfactory allegations.Shen Jiaxin even wrote Academician Zhong Nanshan as a variety of academicians.
However, a young female artist who has not yet made great achievements has also gained some applause on the scolding and accusations of the Medal of the Republic.
I feel that this girl's thinking is very clear, and I have no problem asking.mdash; mdash; A netizen said, and some questioned: Where did this actress say wrong?Baiyunshan with the goods Wang Rong can't criticize at all?Some netizens also called her bravely!What is paradoxic is that Zhong Nanshan, who was asked by the courageous Shen Jiaxin, was also praised by the people many times.
Lawyer Wang Yazhong published an article that has been banned in his WeChat public account. The title is why Zhong Nanshan cannot be questioned?Is he the savior, or the immortal and the emperor?EssenceThe article said: To be honest, I did not see where Shen Jiaxin's questioning was.As an academician of the Chinese Academy of Engineering, Zhong Nanshan eats the Lulu provided by the taxpayer. He should accept the inquiry from the taxpayer and explain his contribution to the country and the people.This is the most basic right to know the taxpayer.
The article pointed out that Zhong Nanshan was the first batch of experts who arrived in Wuhan in the early stage of the epidemic, and the spirit was really good.But later, several times predicted that the epidemic will end the epidemic in two weeks later, and they were all faced by reality. He also pointed out that he endorsed many Chinese medicine to prevent crown diseases. I don't believe him.
However, the article does not provide any strong evidence and discussion, but repeatedly explains why scientists who have been supported by taxpayers are not allowed to be questioned.
The article believes that if there is a problem with Shen Jiaxin's questioning, Academician Zhong Nanshan can respond one by one and refute one by one to clearly obey.In fact, Zhong Nanshan was not the first time that he was questioned to bring goods to the merchant, and he had previously responded to this.
In mid -May of this year, Hongxing News had interviewed the party for commercial advertising for Zhong Nanshan for the products of Angami, Lianhua Qingjuan, and other companies.Zhong Nanshan said that he was unaware of it at the time, and said that there were too many similar rumors, so I would not care about it, and I didn't care at all.
Academician Zhong Nanshan clearly told Red Star News: I have never given any company and product endorsements. How can I do those things?What does it have to do with my business?
In the end, whether Zhong Nanshan has to bring goods for merchants is divergent, and the people who blame him are not conclusive evidence, but this is not the core of this incident.Throughout the remarks of Shen Jiaxin, a view that runs through it is that the little people also have the right to question (challenge) authority. Regardless of the content and method of questioning, the behavior of questioning itself is sacred and should not be suppressed.
Therefore, although Shen Jiaxin's question lacks rationality and politeness, her behavior itself is greater than content. In the eyes of some people, this behavior summons a brilliant image of the weak person who is not afraid of authority.Power.
The stories of the weak who challenged authority against the current also made the general public. Perhaps it is precisely because the public is also the weak, and there is no courage to take the consequences of challenging authority.At this time, if someone has taken a step over the thunder pool, it openly challenges authoritative or established norms, and even the arms will inevitably be able to win some resonance and resonance.
China's rapid development of the Internet ecology provides a variety of and convenient platforms for the noise.Although the authorities have strictly controlled it, there are always resistance to strict and solid walls that always resist from time to time.In recent years, this situation has continued to increase, and it seems that the harder control, the greater the rebound.Shen Jiaxin asked Zhong Nanshan to be banned, but instead won sympathy for her. Many people did not support Shen's remarks, but opposed the official deprivation of her speech.
In terms of supporting the weak or resisting authority, Chinese netizens seem to dare to say more and more, becoming the official for the official to pay attention to or even respond.
