The National University of Singapore announced today (17th) the survey results of the sexual harassment allegations involved in Zheng Yongnian, the former director of the East Asian Institute of the National University.In this regard, Professor Zheng Yongnian responded publicly through representing a lawyer.

The statement issued by the first person denied all the allegations about sexual harassment, and also denied and accused his female staff members had any inappropriate physical contact.

In the State University statement, the survey results showed that there was no evidence to prove that Zheng Yongnian's sexual harassment allegations were true.However, the survey of the National University also pointed out that Zheng Yongnian hugged the female staff of the East Asian Institute at the work conference and violated the Code of Code of Code of Code of Career Staff.The internal survey results are recorded in the case and have been notified.In this regard, Zheng Yongnian clearly emphasized in his response that he only gave her a western -style hug at the time, and patted her shoulders with her right hand without any inappropriate physical contact.

Zheng Yongnian responded to the full text as follows:

The National University of Singapore issued a statement that the allegations and investigation committees were listed in the Annex 1 Middle School, and the employees of an East Asian Institute (the staff) said that my sexual harassment of her allegations was not established.

For the three allegations of the staff, my response in the investigation committee is as follows:

First, she said that when she came to the office for the first time on May 9, 2018, I patted her head and shoulders.I deny the allegations that I have no physical contact with her that day;

Second, she said that on May 30, 2018, I hugged and patted her ass when I met her in the office.I denied the allegations that I just patted her shoulder at that time. My left arm suffered from periarthritis, so I just patted her shoulder with my right arm;

Third, she said that when I took a group photo on October 21, 2018, I used my hand to bypass a person to touch her back.I denied the allegations that the person standing among us was my wife, and I didn't touch her back at all.At that time, the photos showed that my arm was blocked by my wife's shoulder, and objectively there was no possibility of bypassing my wife to touch the back of the staff.

The National University Investigation Committee believes that I was inappropriate to embrace her (or touch her shoulder) on May 30, 2018. I did not get the consent of the staff herself and violated the school rules.Regarding this, I must emphasize the following facts: That day, the staff meeting with me in the office was about to end. When I was preparing to send guests, she proposed that she wanted to make friends with my daughter and proposed to accompany me in my busy era to accompany medaughter.I told her that my daughter was not in Singapore at the time; I also told her that it didn't matter to have a chance to meet in the future.The staff member made a disappointment expression, and I gave her a western hug (with my right hand to pat her shoulder) to show comfort and thank you, but there was no inappropriate body with her.touch.

The staff member was after I refused to be her doctoral tutor and the co -author of her article, and the police accused me after nearly a year.In this year, the staff calling it a year of struggle, the staff member repeatedly showed me the best to me, gave me the dessert I made, actively participated in my academic speech, and hiking activities.Also praised my article in WeChat group.I treat it politely for the staff of the staff, without a special response.

From the beginning to the end, I have never put forward any criticism of the staff, but the staff member attacked me on the media three times and five times.It is very regrettable to identify my email to many universities, education and scholars in China, and scholars.

The State University of Singapore states that it will continue to support the staff.I feel very regrettable and puzzled to a person who has accused others and repeatedly attacked others on the Internet.Why doesn't the National University protect the professor of our school who has worked for it for more than 20 years?During this period, the confusion and mental pressure and pressure of an impulse for me are not considered within the scope of college considerations?In response to the above several points, the National University of the National University has worked for more than 20 years for me for more than 20 years.

The severe warning issued by the police, the legal opinion I got was that according to court cases:

MIDDOT; warning to the legal rights, interests and responsibilities of the parties;

Middot; Warning does not mean that it is a legal binding declaration of judgment of crime or factual judgment, because only the court has the power to make such a judgment and factual judgment.

MIDDOT; it does not have any binding power to the parties, nor can it be considered a consideration for court judgment in the future.

Finally, I sincerely thank everyone for their care!