Reporter/Xu Tian

The death penalty ruling is not approved.

Seven years later, the Wang Shujin case finally ushered in new progress. The Supreme Law did not approve the death penalty and sent it back to the Handan Intermediate People's Court of Hebei Province for retrial.

Wang Shujin, a native of Guangping County, Hebei in January 2005, was arrested in January 2005. He confessed to the police that he had raped many people and killed four people. One of them occurred in the cornfield in the western suburbs of Shijiazhuang in 1994.The police found that the case in the western suburbs of Shijiazhuang had been detected as early as ten years ago, and the murderer Nie Shubin was executed in 1995.

The situation of two cases has now been formed, and it has caused uproar.The Wang Shujin case has gone through a long first and second trials. The court has never recognized the case of the cornfield in the case of the western suburbs of Shijiazhuang.After the second trial of 2013, the case entered the death penalty review process of the Supreme Court.Until November 9, 2020, the Supreme Law made a ruling and did not approve the death penalty.

Wang Shujin's defense lawyer Zhu Aimin told China News Weekly that the ruling of the Supreme Law was suddenly, and no news had been received before.Next, he will go to the Handan Intermediate Court and Wang Shujin's Handan Magnetic County Detention Center to learn about the relevant situation and enter the reconstruction of legal procedures.

Wang Shujin spent seven years in the review of the death penalty.In 2005, when Zhu Aimin met with Wang Shujin for the first time, he asked him when he predicted the final result of the case, and he blurted out: he was dead.In August 2019, China News Weekly used Zhu Aimin to interview Wang Shujin. His answer to this question still did not change: it must not live, one day and night.

Whether it is the real murderer of the Nie Shubin case is still no conclusion

The Supreme Law pointed out in the ruling that Wang Shujin, which was not recognized by the Handan Intermediate Court and Hebei High Court, had a new evidence of the criminal facts of rape and killing victims Zhang Mi, which needed to re -examine and judge the crime.

According to China News Weekly, in January 2005, Wang Shujin confessed to the police that he raped many people and killed four people, namely Liu Moumou, Zhang Moufang, Zhang Moufen, Kang Moumou, and other to Jia Moumou MoumoumouRape and attempted.In the first judgment of the Handan Intermediate Court and the second trial of the Hebei High Court, he only determined that Wang Shujin raped and killed Liu Moumou, Zhang Moufang, and the victim Jia Moumou, who attempted to kill, and sentenced him to death to deprive political rights for life.

The two cases that were not identified by the court were Zhang Moufen and Kangmou.Kang Moumou was the victim of the two fierce cases in the case of the Nie case. In the first instance court, the Handan prosecutor did not include the case into the scope of the prosecution.During the trial, Wang Shujin always determined that he was the true murderer of Kangmou's case, and threw multiple details of the crime.The prosecution proved that Wang Shujin was not really murderer in the case.After the judgment of the first instance, Wang Shujin appealed because the prosecutor did not sue his rape in the cornfield in the western suburbs of Shijiazhuang.The Hebei High Court rejected its appeal and maintained its original judgment.

The Zhang Mouyi case pointed out in the ruling of the Supreme Law has nothing to do with Kangmou's case. It is another case that has not been recognized, that is, the Zhang Moufen case.At that time, the court believed that the facts of the case were unclear, the evidence was insufficient, and it was not determined.

Handan Intermediate People's Court pointed out at the time that although the prosecutor provided Wang Shujin's confession and identification on -site transcripts, on -site exploration materials, autopsy reports, physical evidence inspection reports, witness Wang Moumou and identification transcripts, etc.The DNA sequence of the body evidence was not detected, and the objective evidence of identity of the bone was lacking.In addition, the corpse inspection report failed to determine the length, gender, death, and burial time of the excavation of the bones. Therefore, although the bones were dug under Wang Shujin, the existing evidence was not enough to confirm that the identity of the bone was Zhang Moufen.

On the evening of November 9, Wang Shujin's defense lawyer Zhu Aimin told China News Weekly that the Supreme Law pointed out in the ruling that there was new evidence about the Zhang Moufen case.However, since Wang Shujin's case entered the death penalty review process, for many years, he has not provided any new evidence to the Supreme Law for the Zhang Moufen case.Therefore, he will go to the Handan Intermediate Court to docking with the relevant judges to further understand the issues of the new evidence from what channels and the highest law can obtain.

Waiting for boots to land

Wang Shujin always couldn't figure out that he confessed that Kang Moumou's case (the victim of the Nie Shubin case). Why didn't the court recognize?

This case is obviously complicated.In April 2015, the Nie Shubin case was reviewed in a different place in Shandong High Court. In the review process, a trial of the previous no ancient people mdash; mdash; hearing, listening to the opinions of the complaints, acting lawyers, and original case handling units.At the same time, 15 people, including well -known experts and scholars, representatives of the People's Congress, members of the CPPCC, supervisors of the People's Court, and representatives of the masses, participated.

After the 11 -hour hearing, the Shandong High Court issued a questionnaire to 15 people and designed three options: 1. I believe that Nie Shubin is the true murderer in the case;It is not sure that Wang Shujin committed the crime.

At that time, the questionnaire was not made public.It is understood that the choice of 15 people is not one side.Five legal experts believe that the existing evidence is insufficient and chose the third option.Of the 10 people, the four thought that Nie Shubin was true, and the two thought that Wang Shujin was a real murderer, and 4 people chose the third option.In other words, 11 people cannot be sure that it is Nie Shubin's crime, and 13 people cannot be sure that Wang Shujin committed the crime.

Over the years, Wang Shujin has always insisted that he was the true murder of Kangmou's case.Some people say that because of his persistence, the Nie case was able to be followed and finally rehabilitated.In December 2016, the Second Tour Court of the Supreme Law made a public judgment on the case, arguing that the facts of the Nie Shubin case were unclear and the evidence was insufficient.

Zhang Huanzhi, the mother of Nie Shubin, said that he hated him but thanked him. If it wasn't for the appearance of Wang Shujin, my son's case would not have today.But he did not commit trouble, and my son would not die.Some people also questioned that Wang Shujin was to live for a few more years. After all, the Nie case did not rehabilitate one day.

In Zhu Aimin's eyes, Wang Shujin's waiting for the death penalty was not good. There was a sharp sword hanging from his head at any time, knowing that he would die, but he didn't know when the death period was.A few years ago, when the lowest emotional valley, Wang Shujin told Zhu Aimin that this was the last Spring Festival.At the end of 2016, the Nie case was rehabilitated, and Wang Shujin felt that he was afraid to die again.He sometimes felt that the taste of fear was too difficult, and told Zhu Aimin that it would be better to click early.

Zhu Aimin had twice a letter to the Supreme Law and applied for a re -review of Wang Shujin, but none of them received a reply.In the waiting for the results, Wang Shujin was a little fat, and his mentality was a lot stable.Zhu Aimin even joked with him during a meeting. You said that it was the last Spring Festival you spent 15 years. Which year is it now?Wang Shujin smiled and didn't speak.One year ago, he said to China News Weekly through Zhu Aimin that at present, he eats normally, sleeps normally, and doesn't want anything.

Since the epidemic, Zhu Aimin has not seen him because of strict management of the detention center.The Supreme Law sent the case back to Handan Intermediate Court for retrial. Although the boots did not land, they finally had news.Zhu Aimin told China News Weekly, and next, he will meet with Wang Shujin.During the review, whether it was him or Wang Shujin, he would repeat the case of Kangmou.

Nie Shubin and Wang Shujin, two cases in one case, have become iconic cases in the judicial world, and have a great impact.Who did it?It should always be explained to society and law.Zhu Aimin said.