Li Kaifu, chairman and CEO of Innovation Workshop, appeared on the hot search yesterday (12th). The reason was that he revealed in his speech that he had obtained face data from companies such as Ant Financial.Rexatively responded that the company did not master or collect, and data security was the foundation of standing.Ant Financial also issued a statement.
According to Xinzhiyuan, Li Kaifu mentioned at the Global Entrepreneur Summit on September 12 that early in the early days, helping Guman Technology Company found partners including Meitu and Ant Financial, and asked them to get a lot of face data to help them help themAnalyzing how the various industries cut in, and found several valuable commercialization directions in the subsequent exploration process.
His original words are a company we invested in eight years ago, and today is an artificial intelligence giant who will soon want IPO.Its development path is very unique.It is a group of very technical technologies. Without any experience in this product industry, we can find our business by relying on our unique technical ability.
He said: In the early days, he made a lot of mistakes and took a lot of detours, but in the process of exploration, he found several very valuable business directions including security and logistics.
What Li Kaifu originally wanted to tell the process of exploration from technology to commercialization paths, emphasizing the role he played in this, but did not expect to disclose a meaning, that is, he visited the face data from Ant Financial.EssenceThis involves the red line of user privacy.
The Ant Group took the lead in responding through Weibo that the company has never had contact with Li Kaifu in cooperation with the science and technology, and the company has never provided face data to Kuangxin Technology.
The publicity official micro -issuing statement said that the company does not master and will not actively collect any personal information of the end user. This is the consistent principle.
Li Kaifu also posted Weibo to clarify that he said that he had made a mistake.
Some professionals said from a technical perspective that the information provided may be information about data collection points (more than 80 collection points per face).It's not like everyone thinks directly.
