The email records provided by Zheng Yongnian to the media showed that the former staff of the East Asian Institute sent him an improper content email every day in the past two years.(the Internet)
The photos and evidence presented by Zheng Yongnian show that what the accuser refers to the incident at the Licheng Hotel in 2012 is impossible, so it is unbelievable.As for the case in 2018, the accusations reported to the police in May 2019 after a year.It is understood that after investigation, the police were severely warned, rather than a conditional warning or prosecution, reflecting that there was no sufficient evidence that the case was sexual harassment.
Chen Jing Huang Xiaofang Report
Zheng Yongnian, former director of the East Asia Research Institute of Singapore, was charged with two women's allegations to them in 2012 and 2018.According to the latest inside story learned by Lianhe Zaobao, the case in 2012 was not true, and the case in 2018 did not have sufficient evidence that his behavior constituted a non -ritual crime.
In response to the 2012 case, a Singapore police spokesman confirmed to the newspaper last Sunday that on May 14 this year, he received a report involving non -rituals. The incident time was October 24, 2012.After investigation, the police decided not to take further action.The case ended.Zheng Yongnian himself was interviewed by Phoenix.com the night before, and the testimony stated that he did not harass the woman, but he was harassed by the reporter himself for a long time.
According to this newspaper, the parties who accused Zheng Yongnian's sexual harassment in 2012 were former staff members of the East Asian Institute. She did not directly accuse Zheng Yongnian when she went to the police station, but used the electronic government password to report online.
According to the accused, the non -ritual incident occurred between 8 am and 12 noon on October 24, 2012, and the 15th anniversary forum of the East Asian Institute was on that day.She and Zheng Yongnian took the elevator to the venue at the Rewent Hotel of the forum. She accused Zheng of unbuttoning her bra in the elevator room.
I discussed how to deal with women's harassment behavior with administrative leaders
In an interview with Phoenix.com, Zheng Yongnian said that some photos showed that he accused people wearing a jacket that day, and he could not solve her bra with several layers of clothes.Coupled with the elevator of the Line Hotel is a glass elevator, you can see the situation in the elevator around the elevator.On the first floor of the event, only lunch was on the third floor of the hotel.
In addition, the forum attended the forum that day, including then Deputy Prime Minister Shang Daman, the ambassador of many countries in Singapore and local government officials, entrepreneurs and scholars, plus Zheng Yongnian, then researcher at East Asia, accompanied him throughout him. Before lunchThere is no reason at all, leaving so many important international guests to go to the elevator with alleged people.
While clarifying the above incident, Zheng Yongnian also presented an email record that the woman issued improper content emails to him every day in the past two years.She called Dou Baby in the email and claims to be dumb or baby.
Zheng Yongnian said that he had discussed how to deal with the harassment of the woman with administrative leaders, but the administrative layer believed that the woman had serious psychological problems and suggested that she go to see a psychologist.He also consults the technicians to block the other party's email, but it cannot be blocked because it is the internal email of the National University.Therefore, Zheng Yongnian chose not to read, return, or delete it directly.After the woman reported to the police, Zheng Yongnian found 51 harassment emails sent by the other party from the deleted mailbox and handed all the mail to the Singapore police.He emphasized that due to other people, some places were inconvenient to show the original evidence, and when legal permission, he could show all evidence.
The woman left the East Asian Institute, who took office for 10 years in July this year. She previously answered the newspaper and said that she recently learned that she was not the only victim, so she chose to call the police in May this year.She also accused herself complained to the management of the institute, but she was always unaware.This newspaper has further e -mail to contact the other party, and it has not yet received a response.
Two women recently released news on social media, accusing Zheng Yongnian sexually harassing them. Zheng Yongnian issued a statement through the representative lawyer Xu Tingfang of Eliya Office on the 4th of this month, denied all the charges about sexual harassment.Among them, in response to Zheng Yongnian's 2018 case that was severely warned by the police, Xu Tingfang pointed out that this did not constitute a crime or fact.
The meaning of severe warnings in 2018 cases
A key issue in the 2018 case is the meaning of Stern Warning.This newspaper interviewed Singapore's senior criminal lawyer Chen Qiyu learned that police generally gave two warnings after investigation.Strict warning means that the case has been ended and it is not a criminal record.
Another type of more serious warning is Conditional Warning. Generally, the condition is that if the accused person has committed similar crimes within one or two years, the prosecution has the right to re -file a lawsuit.Police can give warnings through verbal or written ways, but the more common ways in recent years are written warnings.If the police receive the report and find that the allegations are completely unrealistic, they will not take further action or warned.The 2012 case involved in Zheng Yongnian belongs to this category.
As for the case in 2018, the accused person reported to the police in May 2019 after a year. During this period, she still kept in contact with Zheng Yongnian and the relationship between teachers and students. ThereforeThey were shocked.
It is understood that the police did not take conditional warnings or prosecutions after investigation, reflecting that there was no sufficient evidence to prove that the case was sexual harassment.It is not sensitive to time, and the office door should not be closed when you are alone.
A woman involved in the 2018 case was interviewed by the South China Morning Post earlier that she was looking for career development with her colleague's advice and asked her boss Zheng Yongnian.She said that after entering Zheng Yongnian's office, Zheng Yongnian hugged her and patted her ass.She then struggled out of the office and sent a text message to Zheng Yongnian, saying that what happened in the office made her uncomfortable, and Zheng Yongnian responded very sorry.
Zheng Yongnian described in an interview with Phoenix.com. When the woman took the initiative to interview him, she proposed that Zheng Yongnian would introduce her daughter to her friends when she was about to leave, but at the time Zheng Yongnian's daughter was in the United States.Expressing disappointment, so Zheng Yongnian gave a hug to show comfort and farewell.
Zheng Yongnian emphasized that the other party accused him of hugging her and encountered her ass, but it was not true, and he did not formally accept the police's severe warning.In Singapore's legal system, the police can issue such warnings regardless of whether the accused is willing.The National University of Singapore is still under investigation, and I can't say more, so as not to interfere with the school's investigation.
Zheng Yongnian, 58, served as East Asia Research from 2008 to 2019He resigned from the Institute this year and left Singapore in August. He is currently the Dean of the Chinese University of Hong Kong (Shenzhen) Global and Contemporary China Higher Research Institute.He is also the long -term columnist of Lianhe Zaobao.
